PMC:7545501 / 17906-19037 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T54","span":{"begin":396,"end":397},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T55","span":{"begin":430,"end":431},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T56","span":{"begin":546,"end":547},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T57","span":{"begin":685,"end":699},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000982"},{"id":"T58","span":{"begin":685,"end":699},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0004905"},{"id":"T59","span":{"begin":735,"end":747},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000245"},{"id":"T60","span":{"begin":752,"end":758},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_33208"},{"id":"T61","span":{"begin":955,"end":958},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582"}],"text":"The GHS Index’s approach to biosecurity and biosafety aligns with that of the IHR (2005), which require core health system competencies that apply universally to all countries regardless of income level. It is worth noting, too, that while category 1 of the GHS Index includes many biosecurity and biosafety indicators, it is not weighted more heavily than other categories: category 1 scores as a whole account for only 16.3% of a country’s total score, while scores for biosecurity and biosafety indicators each determine approximately 2.6% of a country’s overall score. Including these indicators in the GHS Index also aligns with international health security norms, such as those articulated in the IHR (2005), the JEE, the World Organisation for Animal Health’s Performance of Veterinary Services Evaluations, the GHSA, the Biological Weapons Convention and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention has also prioritised these capacities through its continent-wide Initiative on Strengthening Biosafety and Biosecurity, which aligns with both the JEE and IHR implementation.21"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T78","span":{"begin":0,"end":203},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T79","span":{"begin":204,"end":572},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T80","span":{"begin":573,"end":900},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T81","span":{"begin":901,"end":1131},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"The GHS Index’s approach to biosecurity and biosafety aligns with that of the IHR (2005), which require core health system competencies that apply universally to all countries regardless of income level. It is worth noting, too, that while category 1 of the GHS Index includes many biosecurity and biosafety indicators, it is not weighted more heavily than other categories: category 1 scores as a whole account for only 16.3% of a country’s total score, while scores for biosecurity and biosafety indicators each determine approximately 2.6% of a country’s overall score. Including these indicators in the GHS Index also aligns with international health security norms, such as those articulated in the IHR (2005), the JEE, the World Organisation for Animal Health’s Performance of Veterinary Services Evaluations, the GHSA, the Biological Weapons Convention and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention has also prioritised these capacities through its continent-wide Initiative on Strengthening Biosafety and Biosecurity, which aligns with both the JEE and IHR implementation.21"}