PMC:7499499 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":351,"end":359},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":378,"end":381},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":645,"end":653},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":743,"end":751},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":786,"end":794},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":830,"end":836},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T1","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma62871"},{"id":"A2","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T2","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma62872"},{"id":"A3","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T3","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma62871"},{"id":"A4","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T4","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma62871"},{"id":"A5","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T5","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma62871"},{"id":"A6","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T6","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma84116"}],"text":"SARS-CoV-2 Community Transmission disproportionately affects Latinx population during Shelter-in-Place in San Francisco\n\nAbstract\nAbstract\n\nBackground\nThere is urgent need to understand the dynamics and risk factors driving ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during shelter-in-place mandates.\n\nMethods\nWe offered SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR and antibody (Abbott ARCHITECT IgG) testing, regardless of symptoms, to all residents (≥4 years) and workers in a San Francisco census tract (population: 5,174) at outdoor, community-mobilized events over four days. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 point prevalence (PCR-positive) and cumulative incidence (antibody or PCR-positive) in the census tract and evaluated risk factors for recent (PCR-positive/antibody-negative) versus prior infection (antibody-positive/PCR-negative). SARS-CoV-2 genome recovery and phylogenetics were used to measure viral strain diversity, establish viral lineages present, and estimate number of introductions.\n\nResults\nWe tested 3,953 persons: 40% Latinx; 41% White; 9% Asian/Pacific Islander; and 2% Black. Overall, 2.1% (83/3,871) tested PCR-positive: 95% were Latinx and 52% asymptomatic when tested. 1.7% of census tract residents and 6.0% of workers (non-census tract residents) were PCR-positive. Among 2,598 tract residents, estimated point prevalence of PCR-positives was 2.3% (95%CI: 1.2-3.8%): 3.9% (95%CI: 2.0-6.4%) among Latinx vs. 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0-0.4%) among non-Latinx persons. Estimated cumulative incidence among residents was 6.1% (95%CI: 4.0-8.6%). Prior infections were 67% Latinx, 16% White, and 17% other ethnicities. Among recent infections, 96% were Latinx. Risk factors for recent infection were Latinx ethnicity, inability to shelter-in-place and maintain income, frontline service work, unemployment, and household income \u0026$50,000/year. Five SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic lineages were detected.\n\nConclusion\nSARS-CoV-2 infections from diverse lineages continued circulating among low-income, Latinx persons unable to work from home and maintain income during San Francisco’s shelter-in-place ordinance.\n\n"}

    LitCovid-PD-MONDO

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":0,"end":8},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":232,"end":240},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":310,"end":318},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":576,"end":584},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":775,"end":784},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":819,"end":827},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T7","span":{"begin":1545,"end":1555},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":1624,"end":1634},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T9","span":{"begin":1677,"end":1686},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T10","span":{"begin":1840,"end":1848},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T11","span":{"begin":1900,"end":1908},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T12","span":{"begin":1911,"end":1921},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T1","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A2","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T2","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A3","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T3","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A4","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T4","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A5","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T5","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A6","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T6","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A7","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T7","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A8","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T8","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A9","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T9","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A10","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T10","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A11","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T11","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A12","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T12","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"}],"text":"SARS-CoV-2 Community Transmission disproportionately affects Latinx population during Shelter-in-Place in San Francisco\n\nAbstract\nAbstract\n\nBackground\nThere is urgent need to understand the dynamics and risk factors driving ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during shelter-in-place mandates.\n\nMethods\nWe offered SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR and antibody (Abbott ARCHITECT IgG) testing, regardless of symptoms, to all residents (≥4 years) and workers in a San Francisco census tract (population: 5,174) at outdoor, community-mobilized events over four days. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 point prevalence (PCR-positive) and cumulative incidence (antibody or PCR-positive) in the census tract and evaluated risk factors for recent (PCR-positive/antibody-negative) versus prior infection (antibody-positive/PCR-negative). SARS-CoV-2 genome recovery and phylogenetics were used to measure viral strain diversity, establish viral lineages present, and estimate number of introductions.\n\nResults\nWe tested 3,953 persons: 40% Latinx; 41% White; 9% Asian/Pacific Islander; and 2% Black. Overall, 2.1% (83/3,871) tested PCR-positive: 95% were Latinx and 52% asymptomatic when tested. 1.7% of census tract residents and 6.0% of workers (non-census tract residents) were PCR-positive. Among 2,598 tract residents, estimated point prevalence of PCR-positives was 2.3% (95%CI: 1.2-3.8%): 3.9% (95%CI: 2.0-6.4%) among Latinx vs. 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0-0.4%) among non-Latinx persons. Estimated cumulative incidence among residents was 6.1% (95%CI: 4.0-8.6%). Prior infections were 67% Latinx, 16% White, and 17% other ethnicities. Among recent infections, 96% were Latinx. Risk factors for recent infection were Latinx ethnicity, inability to shelter-in-place and maintain income, frontline service work, unemployment, and household income \u0026$50,000/year. Five SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic lineages were detected.\n\nConclusion\nSARS-CoV-2 infections from diverse lineages continued circulating among low-income, Latinx persons unable to work from home and maintain income during San Francisco’s shelter-in-place ordinance.\n\n"}

    LitCovid-PD-CLO

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":383,"end":390},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":459,"end":460},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":993,"end":999},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":1027,"end":1029},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0053794"},{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":1104,"end":1110},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":1145,"end":1147},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001407"},{"id":"T7","span":{"begin":1167,"end":1173},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"}],"text":"SARS-CoV-2 Community Transmission disproportionately affects Latinx population during Shelter-in-Place in San Francisco\n\nAbstract\nAbstract\n\nBackground\nThere is urgent need to understand the dynamics and risk factors driving ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during shelter-in-place mandates.\n\nMethods\nWe offered SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR and antibody (Abbott ARCHITECT IgG) testing, regardless of symptoms, to all residents (≥4 years) and workers in a San Francisco census tract (population: 5,174) at outdoor, community-mobilized events over four days. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 point prevalence (PCR-positive) and cumulative incidence (antibody or PCR-positive) in the census tract and evaluated risk factors for recent (PCR-positive/antibody-negative) versus prior infection (antibody-positive/PCR-negative). SARS-CoV-2 genome recovery and phylogenetics were used to measure viral strain diversity, establish viral lineages present, and estimate number of introductions.\n\nResults\nWe tested 3,953 persons: 40% Latinx; 41% White; 9% Asian/Pacific Islander; and 2% Black. Overall, 2.1% (83/3,871) tested PCR-positive: 95% were Latinx and 52% asymptomatic when tested. 1.7% of census tract residents and 6.0% of workers (non-census tract residents) were PCR-positive. Among 2,598 tract residents, estimated point prevalence of PCR-positives was 2.3% (95%CI: 1.2-3.8%): 3.9% (95%CI: 2.0-6.4%) among Latinx vs. 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0-0.4%) among non-Latinx persons. Estimated cumulative incidence among residents was 6.1% (95%CI: 4.0-8.6%). Prior infections were 67% Latinx, 16% White, and 17% other ethnicities. Among recent infections, 96% were Latinx. Risk factors for recent infection were Latinx ethnicity, inability to shelter-in-place and maintain income, frontline service work, unemployment, and household income \u0026$50,000/year. Five SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic lineages were detected.\n\nConclusion\nSARS-CoV-2 infections from diverse lineages continued circulating among low-income, Latinx persons unable to work from home and maintain income during San Francisco’s shelter-in-place ordinance.\n\n"}

    LitCovid-PubTator

    {"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"1","span":{"begin":0,"end":10},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"3","span":{"begin":232,"end":242},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"9","span":{"begin":310,"end":320},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"10","span":{"begin":576,"end":586},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"11","span":{"begin":819,"end":829},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"12","span":{"begin":361,"end":381},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"13","span":{"begin":775,"end":784},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"20","span":{"begin":1006,"end":1013},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"21","span":{"begin":1455,"end":1462},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"22","span":{"begin":1840,"end":1850},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"23","span":{"begin":1545,"end":1555},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"24","span":{"begin":1624,"end":1634},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"25","span":{"begin":1677,"end":1686},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"28","span":{"begin":1991,"end":1998},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"29","span":{"begin":1900,"end":1921},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"1","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A3","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"3","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A9","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"9","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A10","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"10","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A11","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"11","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A12","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"12","obj":"MESH:D017099"},{"id":"A13","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"13","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A20","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"20","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A21","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"21","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A22","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"22","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A23","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"23","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A24","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"24","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A25","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"25","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A28","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"28","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A29","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"29","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"SARS-CoV-2 Community Transmission disproportionately affects Latinx population during Shelter-in-Place in San Francisco\n\nAbstract\nAbstract\n\nBackground\nThere is urgent need to understand the dynamics and risk factors driving ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during shelter-in-place mandates.\n\nMethods\nWe offered SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR and antibody (Abbott ARCHITECT IgG) testing, regardless of symptoms, to all residents (≥4 years) and workers in a San Francisco census tract (population: 5,174) at outdoor, community-mobilized events over four days. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 point prevalence (PCR-positive) and cumulative incidence (antibody or PCR-positive) in the census tract and evaluated risk factors for recent (PCR-positive/antibody-negative) versus prior infection (antibody-positive/PCR-negative). SARS-CoV-2 genome recovery and phylogenetics were used to measure viral strain diversity, establish viral lineages present, and estimate number of introductions.\n\nResults\nWe tested 3,953 persons: 40% Latinx; 41% White; 9% Asian/Pacific Islander; and 2% Black. Overall, 2.1% (83/3,871) tested PCR-positive: 95% were Latinx and 52% asymptomatic when tested. 1.7% of census tract residents and 6.0% of workers (non-census tract residents) were PCR-positive. Among 2,598 tract residents, estimated point prevalence of PCR-positives was 2.3% (95%CI: 1.2-3.8%): 3.9% (95%CI: 2.0-6.4%) among Latinx vs. 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0-0.4%) among non-Latinx persons. Estimated cumulative incidence among residents was 6.1% (95%CI: 4.0-8.6%). Prior infections were 67% Latinx, 16% White, and 17% other ethnicities. Among recent infections, 96% were Latinx. Risk factors for recent infection were Latinx ethnicity, inability to shelter-in-place and maintain income, frontline service work, unemployment, and household income \u0026$50,000/year. Five SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic lineages were detected.\n\nConclusion\nSARS-CoV-2 infections from diverse lineages continued circulating among low-income, Latinx persons unable to work from home and maintain income during San Francisco’s shelter-in-place ordinance.\n\n"}

    LitCovid-PD-GO-BP

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":321,"end":342},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001171"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":329,"end":342},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0006351"}],"text":"SARS-CoV-2 Community Transmission disproportionately affects Latinx population during Shelter-in-Place in San Francisco\n\nAbstract\nAbstract\n\nBackground\nThere is urgent need to understand the dynamics and risk factors driving ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during shelter-in-place mandates.\n\nMethods\nWe offered SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR and antibody (Abbott ARCHITECT IgG) testing, regardless of symptoms, to all residents (≥4 years) and workers in a San Francisco census tract (population: 5,174) at outdoor, community-mobilized events over four days. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 point prevalence (PCR-positive) and cumulative incidence (antibody or PCR-positive) in the census tract and evaluated risk factors for recent (PCR-positive/antibody-negative) versus prior infection (antibody-positive/PCR-negative). SARS-CoV-2 genome recovery and phylogenetics were used to measure viral strain diversity, establish viral lineages present, and estimate number of introductions.\n\nResults\nWe tested 3,953 persons: 40% Latinx; 41% White; 9% Asian/Pacific Islander; and 2% Black. Overall, 2.1% (83/3,871) tested PCR-positive: 95% were Latinx and 52% asymptomatic when tested. 1.7% of census tract residents and 6.0% of workers (non-census tract residents) were PCR-positive. Among 2,598 tract residents, estimated point prevalence of PCR-positives was 2.3% (95%CI: 1.2-3.8%): 3.9% (95%CI: 2.0-6.4%) among Latinx vs. 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0-0.4%) among non-Latinx persons. Estimated cumulative incidence among residents was 6.1% (95%CI: 4.0-8.6%). Prior infections were 67% Latinx, 16% White, and 17% other ethnicities. Among recent infections, 96% were Latinx. Risk factors for recent infection were Latinx ethnicity, inability to shelter-in-place and maintain income, frontline service work, unemployment, and household income \u0026$50,000/year. Five SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic lineages were detected.\n\nConclusion\nSARS-CoV-2 infections from diverse lineages continued circulating among low-income, Latinx persons unable to work from home and maintain income during San Francisco’s shelter-in-place ordinance.\n\n"}

    LitCovid-sentences

    {"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":0,"end":119},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":121,"end":129},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":130,"end":138},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":140,"end":150},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":151,"end":289},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":291,"end":298},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T7","span":{"begin":299,"end":500},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":501,"end":562},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T9","span":{"begin":563,"end":818},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T10","span":{"begin":819,"end":980},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T11","span":{"begin":982,"end":989},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T12","span":{"begin":990,"end":1014},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T13","span":{"begin":1015,"end":1078},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T14","span":{"begin":1079,"end":1124},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T15","span":{"begin":1125,"end":1174},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T16","span":{"begin":1175,"end":1273},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T17","span":{"begin":1274,"end":1363},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T18","span":{"begin":1364,"end":1374},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T19","span":{"begin":1375,"end":1387},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T20","span":{"begin":1388,"end":1427},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T21","span":{"begin":1428,"end":1463},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T22","span":{"begin":1464,"end":1527},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T23","span":{"begin":1528,"end":1538},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T24","span":{"begin":1539,"end":1610},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T25","span":{"begin":1611,"end":1652},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T26","span":{"begin":1653,"end":1834},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T27","span":{"begin":1835,"end":1887},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T28","span":{"begin":1889,"end":1899},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T29","span":{"begin":1900,"end":2094},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"SARS-CoV-2 Community Transmission disproportionately affects Latinx population during Shelter-in-Place in San Francisco\n\nAbstract\nAbstract\n\nBackground\nThere is urgent need to understand the dynamics and risk factors driving ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during shelter-in-place mandates.\n\nMethods\nWe offered SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR and antibody (Abbott ARCHITECT IgG) testing, regardless of symptoms, to all residents (≥4 years) and workers in a San Francisco census tract (population: 5,174) at outdoor, community-mobilized events over four days. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 point prevalence (PCR-positive) and cumulative incidence (antibody or PCR-positive) in the census tract and evaluated risk factors for recent (PCR-positive/antibody-negative) versus prior infection (antibody-positive/PCR-negative). SARS-CoV-2 genome recovery and phylogenetics were used to measure viral strain diversity, establish viral lineages present, and estimate number of introductions.\n\nResults\nWe tested 3,953 persons: 40% Latinx; 41% White; 9% Asian/Pacific Islander; and 2% Black. Overall, 2.1% (83/3,871) tested PCR-positive: 95% were Latinx and 52% asymptomatic when tested. 1.7% of census tract residents and 6.0% of workers (non-census tract residents) were PCR-positive. Among 2,598 tract residents, estimated point prevalence of PCR-positives was 2.3% (95%CI: 1.2-3.8%): 3.9% (95%CI: 2.0-6.4%) among Latinx vs. 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0-0.4%) among non-Latinx persons. Estimated cumulative incidence among residents was 6.1% (95%CI: 4.0-8.6%). Prior infections were 67% Latinx, 16% White, and 17% other ethnicities. Among recent infections, 96% were Latinx. Risk factors for recent infection were Latinx ethnicity, inability to shelter-in-place and maintain income, frontline service work, unemployment, and household income \u0026$50,000/year. Five SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic lineages were detected.\n\nConclusion\nSARS-CoV-2 infections from diverse lineages continued circulating among low-income, Latinx persons unable to work from home and maintain income during San Francisco’s shelter-in-place ordinance.\n\n"}