PMC:7457008 / 21880-23719 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T76","span":{"begin":449,"end":457},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T77","span":{"begin":888,"end":895},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T79","span":{"begin":925,"end":932},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T81","span":{"begin":1081,"end":1088},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T83","span":{"begin":1678,"end":1685},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A76","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T76","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"},{"id":"A77","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T77","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005618"},{"id":"A78","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T77","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0011918"},{"id":"A79","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T79","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005618"},{"id":"A80","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T79","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0011918"},{"id":"A81","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T81","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005618"},{"id":"A82","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T81","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0011918"},{"id":"A83","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T83","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005618"},{"id":"A84","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T83","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0011918"}],"text":"We recognize that there are some limitations to our study. Ophthalmologists who have been redeployed are more likely to respond to the survey compared to those who are not. Although our results showed that those who are not redeployed had a good survey completion rate, the questionnaire was shorter in this group. The response rate was low in the deployed ST1-2 group. This may be due to the fact that the majority of them were sent to wards (both COVID-19 and clean areas) where they were likely to have an antisocial shift pattern. There was a non-randomized distribution of the survey. This methodology was chosen to capture as many of those deployed across the UK targeting through trainee networks but in addition to allow snowballing of the survey from one respondent to another. This could have introduced a potential source of sampling bias. The survey allowed other reasons for anxiety to be identified such as the anxiety from litigation from working in an area outside of their expert area. We did note that none of the respondents mentioned this as a reason for their anxiety and this may be partly due to assurances from their trust of the provision of trust indemnity. Although the online survey provider only allowed a single response from a device, we do acknowledge that duplication of the survey could occur if an alternate device was used by the same individual. We have performed the survey at this point to capture the reflection in action, but we understand that it does not represent the overall view of the pandemic. Further studies assessing anxieties in other groups such as anesthetists or intensive care doctors would be useful to determine whether anxiety was created by being asked to work in unfamiliar physical environments with patients and diseases outside our usual practice or being in personal danger."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T123","span":{"begin":239,"end":240},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T124","span":{"begin":545,"end":546},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T125","span":{"begin":814,"end":815},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T126","span":{"begin":1062,"end":1063},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T127","span":{"begin":1233,"end":1234},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T128","span":{"begin":1256,"end":1257},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T129","span":{"begin":1258,"end":1264},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000968"},{"id":"T130","span":{"begin":1343,"end":1349},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000968"}],"text":"We recognize that there are some limitations to our study. Ophthalmologists who have been redeployed are more likely to respond to the survey compared to those who are not. Although our results showed that those who are not redeployed had a good survey completion rate, the questionnaire was shorter in this group. The response rate was low in the deployed ST1-2 group. This may be due to the fact that the majority of them were sent to wards (both COVID-19 and clean areas) where they were likely to have an antisocial shift pattern. There was a non-randomized distribution of the survey. This methodology was chosen to capture as many of those deployed across the UK targeting through trainee networks but in addition to allow snowballing of the survey from one respondent to another. This could have introduced a potential source of sampling bias. The survey allowed other reasons for anxiety to be identified such as the anxiety from litigation from working in an area outside of their expert area. We did note that none of the respondents mentioned this as a reason for their anxiety and this may be partly due to assurances from their trust of the provision of trust indemnity. Although the online survey provider only allowed a single response from a device, we do acknowledge that duplication of the survey could occur if an alternate device was used by the same individual. We have performed the survey at this point to capture the reflection in action, but we understand that it does not represent the overall view of the pandemic. Further studies assessing anxieties in other groups such as anesthetists or intensive care doctors would be useful to determine whether anxiety was created by being asked to work in unfamiliar physical environments with patients and diseases outside our usual practice or being in personal danger."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T28","span":{"begin":308,"end":313},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T29","span":{"begin":363,"end":368},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A28","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T28","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24433"},{"id":"A29","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T29","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24433"}],"text":"We recognize that there are some limitations to our study. Ophthalmologists who have been redeployed are more likely to respond to the survey compared to those who are not. Although our results showed that those who are not redeployed had a good survey completion rate, the questionnaire was shorter in this group. The response rate was low in the deployed ST1-2 group. This may be due to the fact that the majority of them were sent to wards (both COVID-19 and clean areas) where they were likely to have an antisocial shift pattern. There was a non-randomized distribution of the survey. This methodology was chosen to capture as many of those deployed across the UK targeting through trainee networks but in addition to allow snowballing of the survey from one respondent to another. This could have introduced a potential source of sampling bias. The survey allowed other reasons for anxiety to be identified such as the anxiety from litigation from working in an area outside of their expert area. We did note that none of the respondents mentioned this as a reason for their anxiety and this may be partly due to assurances from their trust of the provision of trust indemnity. Although the online survey provider only allowed a single response from a device, we do acknowledge that duplication of the survey could occur if an alternate device was used by the same individual. We have performed the survey at this point to capture the reflection in action, but we understand that it does not represent the overall view of the pandemic. Further studies assessing anxieties in other groups such as anesthetists or intensive care doctors would be useful to determine whether anxiety was created by being asked to work in unfamiliar physical environments with patients and diseases outside our usual practice or being in personal danger."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"200","span":{"begin":357,"end":362},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"201","span":{"begin":1762,"end":1770},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"202","span":{"begin":449,"end":457},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"203","span":{"begin":888,"end":895},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"204","span":{"begin":925,"end":932},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"205","span":{"begin":1081,"end":1088},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"206","span":{"begin":1568,"end":1577},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"207","span":{"begin":1678,"end":1685},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A200","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"200","obj":"Gene:1316"},{"id":"A201","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"201","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A202","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"202","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A203","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"203","obj":"MESH:D001007"},{"id":"A204","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"204","obj":"MESH:D001007"},{"id":"A205","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"205","obj":"MESH:D001007"},{"id":"A206","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"206","obj":"MESH:D001007"},{"id":"A207","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"207","obj":"MESH:D001007"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"We recognize that there are some limitations to our study. Ophthalmologists who have been redeployed are more likely to respond to the survey compared to those who are not. Although our results showed that those who are not redeployed had a good survey completion rate, the questionnaire was shorter in this group. The response rate was low in the deployed ST1-2 group. This may be due to the fact that the majority of them were sent to wards (both COVID-19 and clean areas) where they were likely to have an antisocial shift pattern. There was a non-randomized distribution of the survey. This methodology was chosen to capture as many of those deployed across the UK targeting through trainee networks but in addition to allow snowballing of the survey from one respondent to another. This could have introduced a potential source of sampling bias. The survey allowed other reasons for anxiety to be identified such as the anxiety from litigation from working in an area outside of their expert area. We did note that none of the respondents mentioned this as a reason for their anxiety and this may be partly due to assurances from their trust of the provision of trust indemnity. Although the online survey provider only allowed a single response from a device, we do acknowledge that duplication of the survey could occur if an alternate device was used by the same individual. We have performed the survey at this point to capture the reflection in action, but we understand that it does not represent the overall view of the pandemic. Further studies assessing anxieties in other groups such as anesthetists or intensive care doctors would be useful to determine whether anxiety was created by being asked to work in unfamiliar physical environments with patients and diseases outside our usual practice or being in personal danger."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T30","span":{"begin":888,"end":895},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T31","span":{"begin":925,"end":932},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T32","span":{"begin":1081,"end":1088},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T33","span":{"begin":1678,"end":1685},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A30","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T30","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000739"},{"id":"A31","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T31","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000739"},{"id":"A32","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T32","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000739"},{"id":"A33","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T33","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000739"}],"text":"We recognize that there are some limitations to our study. Ophthalmologists who have been redeployed are more likely to respond to the survey compared to those who are not. Although our results showed that those who are not redeployed had a good survey completion rate, the questionnaire was shorter in this group. The response rate was low in the deployed ST1-2 group. This may be due to the fact that the majority of them were sent to wards (both COVID-19 and clean areas) where they were likely to have an antisocial shift pattern. There was a non-randomized distribution of the survey. This methodology was chosen to capture as many of those deployed across the UK targeting through trainee networks but in addition to allow snowballing of the survey from one respondent to another. This could have introduced a potential source of sampling bias. The survey allowed other reasons for anxiety to be identified such as the anxiety from litigation from working in an area outside of their expert area. We did note that none of the respondents mentioned this as a reason for their anxiety and this may be partly due to assurances from their trust of the provision of trust indemnity. Although the online survey provider only allowed a single response from a device, we do acknowledge that duplication of the survey could occur if an alternate device was used by the same individual. We have performed the survey at this point to capture the reflection in action, but we understand that it does not represent the overall view of the pandemic. Further studies assessing anxieties in other groups such as anesthetists or intensive care doctors would be useful to determine whether anxiety was created by being asked to work in unfamiliar physical environments with patients and diseases outside our usual practice or being in personal danger."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T176","span":{"begin":0,"end":58},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T177","span":{"begin":59,"end":172},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T178","span":{"begin":173,"end":314},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T179","span":{"begin":315,"end":369},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T180","span":{"begin":370,"end":534},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T181","span":{"begin":535,"end":589},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T182","span":{"begin":590,"end":786},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T183","span":{"begin":787,"end":850},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T184","span":{"begin":851,"end":1002},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T185","span":{"begin":1003,"end":1183},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T186","span":{"begin":1184,"end":1382},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T187","span":{"begin":1383,"end":1541},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T188","span":{"begin":1542,"end":1839},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"We recognize that there are some limitations to our study. Ophthalmologists who have been redeployed are more likely to respond to the survey compared to those who are not. Although our results showed that those who are not redeployed had a good survey completion rate, the questionnaire was shorter in this group. The response rate was low in the deployed ST1-2 group. This may be due to the fact that the majority of them were sent to wards (both COVID-19 and clean areas) where they were likely to have an antisocial shift pattern. There was a non-randomized distribution of the survey. This methodology was chosen to capture as many of those deployed across the UK targeting through trainee networks but in addition to allow snowballing of the survey from one respondent to another. This could have introduced a potential source of sampling bias. The survey allowed other reasons for anxiety to be identified such as the anxiety from litigation from working in an area outside of their expert area. We did note that none of the respondents mentioned this as a reason for their anxiety and this may be partly due to assurances from their trust of the provision of trust indemnity. Although the online survey provider only allowed a single response from a device, we do acknowledge that duplication of the survey could occur if an alternate device was used by the same individual. We have performed the survey at this point to capture the reflection in action, but we understand that it does not represent the overall view of the pandemic. Further studies assessing anxieties in other groups such as anesthetists or intensive care doctors would be useful to determine whether anxiety was created by being asked to work in unfamiliar physical environments with patients and diseases outside our usual practice or being in personal danger."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PMC-OGER-BB","denotations":[{"id":"T62","span":{"begin":59,"end":75},"obj":"UBERON:0000970"},{"id":"T63","span":{"begin":449,"end":457},"obj":"SP_7"},{"id":"T64","span":{"begin":1371,"end":1381},"obj":"NCBITaxon:1"},{"id":"T67027","span":{"begin":59,"end":75},"obj":"UBERON:0000970"},{"id":"T71910","span":{"begin":449,"end":457},"obj":"SP_7"},{"id":"T25924","span":{"begin":1371,"end":1381},"obj":"NCBITaxon:1"}],"text":"We recognize that there are some limitations to our study. Ophthalmologists who have been redeployed are more likely to respond to the survey compared to those who are not. Although our results showed that those who are not redeployed had a good survey completion rate, the questionnaire was shorter in this group. The response rate was low in the deployed ST1-2 group. This may be due to the fact that the majority of them were sent to wards (both COVID-19 and clean areas) where they were likely to have an antisocial shift pattern. There was a non-randomized distribution of the survey. This methodology was chosen to capture as many of those deployed across the UK targeting through trainee networks but in addition to allow snowballing of the survey from one respondent to another. This could have introduced a potential source of sampling bias. The survey allowed other reasons for anxiety to be identified such as the anxiety from litigation from working in an area outside of their expert area. We did note that none of the respondents mentioned this as a reason for their anxiety and this may be partly due to assurances from their trust of the provision of trust indemnity. Although the online survey provider only allowed a single response from a device, we do acknowledge that duplication of the survey could occur if an alternate device was used by the same individual. We have performed the survey at this point to capture the reflection in action, but we understand that it does not represent the overall view of the pandemic. Further studies assessing anxieties in other groups such as anesthetists or intensive care doctors would be useful to determine whether anxiety was created by being asked to work in unfamiliar physical environments with patients and diseases outside our usual practice or being in personal danger."}