PMC:7454258 / 190578-192198 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T39","span":{"begin":1603,"end":1607},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A39","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T39","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma24728"}],"text":"NIN would add strong authority, infrastructure, investment, and external advisory mechanisms for nutrition research to the nation's largest funder of science. NIN would require a Federal Advisory Committee (Council) and would have a budget and funding authority. NIN would allow NIH to better address nutrition science that is cross-cutting rather than disease-specific, both across institutes, centers, and offices within NIH and with other federal departments and agencies. For example, the NIN would be instrumental in implementing and achieving the goals of the new 2020–2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research (129). As a long-term structure, NIN's activities and benefits would provide both expected and unexpected returns over many decades, outlasting shorter-term options such as cross-agency initiatives and changing priorities of individual administrations, and evolving appropriately with changes in science, food systems, nutritional needs, and disease conditions of the US public. A new institute could help maintain the strength of NIH focus on laboratory and clinical research in nutrition while, at the same time, facilitating expansion to research efforts to other translational priorities across NIH and across other federal departments and agencies. As has been seen with NIH research overall, NIN's coordinated leadership, structure, and capacity would likely provide a strong ROI to the US economy. The combination of NIN plus a new cross-governmental approach (Table 3) would provide a powerful strategy to address the scope and scale of the challenges and opportunities we face as a nation."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T50","span":{"begin":1558,"end":1563},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T51","span":{"begin":1603,"end":1607},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A50","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T50","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002542"},{"id":"A51","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T51","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001456"}],"text":"NIN would add strong authority, infrastructure, investment, and external advisory mechanisms for nutrition research to the nation's largest funder of science. NIN would require a Federal Advisory Committee (Council) and would have a budget and funding authority. NIN would allow NIH to better address nutrition science that is cross-cutting rather than disease-specific, both across institutes, centers, and offices within NIH and with other federal departments and agencies. For example, the NIN would be instrumental in implementing and achieving the goals of the new 2020–2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research (129). As a long-term structure, NIN's activities and benefits would provide both expected and unexpected returns over many decades, outlasting shorter-term options such as cross-agency initiatives and changing priorities of individual administrations, and evolving appropriately with changes in science, food systems, nutritional needs, and disease conditions of the US public. A new institute could help maintain the strength of NIH focus on laboratory and clinical research in nutrition while, at the same time, facilitating expansion to research efforts to other translational priorities across NIH and across other federal departments and agencies. As has been seen with NIH research overall, NIN's coordinated leadership, structure, and capacity would likely provide a strong ROI to the US economy. The combination of NIN plus a new cross-governmental approach (Table 3) would provide a powerful strategy to address the scope and scale of the challenges and opportunities we face as a nation."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T415","span":{"begin":177,"end":178},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T416","span":{"begin":231,"end":232},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T417","span":{"begin":506,"end":518},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000968"},{"id":"T418","span":{"begin":632,"end":633},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T419","span":{"begin":661,"end":671},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001658"},{"id":"T420","span":{"begin":1001,"end":1002},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T421","span":{"begin":1057,"end":1062},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0009985"},{"id":"T422","span":{"begin":1279,"end":1282},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582"},{"id":"T423","span":{"begin":1395,"end":1396},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T424","span":{"begin":1455,"end":1456},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T425","span":{"begin":1513,"end":1514},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T426","span":{"begin":1603,"end":1607},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001456"},{"id":"T427","span":{"begin":1611,"end":1612},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"}],"text":"NIN would add strong authority, infrastructure, investment, and external advisory mechanisms for nutrition research to the nation's largest funder of science. NIN would require a Federal Advisory Committee (Council) and would have a budget and funding authority. NIN would allow NIH to better address nutrition science that is cross-cutting rather than disease-specific, both across institutes, centers, and offices within NIH and with other federal departments and agencies. For example, the NIN would be instrumental in implementing and achieving the goals of the new 2020–2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research (129). As a long-term structure, NIN's activities and benefits would provide both expected and unexpected returns over many decades, outlasting shorter-term options such as cross-agency initiatives and changing priorities of individual administrations, and evolving appropriately with changes in science, food systems, nutritional needs, and disease conditions of the US public. A new institute could help maintain the strength of NIH focus on laboratory and clinical research in nutrition while, at the same time, facilitating expansion to research efforts to other translational priorities across NIH and across other federal departments and agencies. As has been seen with NIH research overall, NIN's coordinated leadership, structure, and capacity would likely provide a strong ROI to the US economy. The combination of NIN plus a new cross-governmental approach (Table 3) would provide a powerful strategy to address the scope and scale of the challenges and opportunities we face as a nation."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T93275","span":{"begin":1189,"end":1202},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0006412"}],"text":"NIN would add strong authority, infrastructure, investment, and external advisory mechanisms for nutrition research to the nation's largest funder of science. NIN would require a Federal Advisory Committee (Council) and would have a budget and funding authority. NIN would allow NIH to better address nutrition science that is cross-cutting rather than disease-specific, both across institutes, centers, and offices within NIH and with other federal departments and agencies. For example, the NIN would be instrumental in implementing and achieving the goals of the new 2020–2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research (129). As a long-term structure, NIN's activities and benefits would provide both expected and unexpected returns over many decades, outlasting shorter-term options such as cross-agency initiatives and changing priorities of individual administrations, and evolving appropriately with changes in science, food systems, nutritional needs, and disease conditions of the US public. A new institute could help maintain the strength of NIH focus on laboratory and clinical research in nutrition while, at the same time, facilitating expansion to research efforts to other translational priorities across NIH and across other federal departments and agencies. As has been seen with NIH research overall, NIN's coordinated leadership, structure, and capacity would likely provide a strong ROI to the US economy. The combination of NIN plus a new cross-governmental approach (Table 3) would provide a powerful strategy to address the scope and scale of the challenges and opportunities we face as a nation."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"849","span":{"begin":0,"end":3},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"850","span":{"begin":159,"end":162},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"851","span":{"begin":263,"end":266},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"852","span":{"begin":493,"end":496},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"853","span":{"begin":655,"end":658},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"854","span":{"begin":1320,"end":1323},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"855","span":{"begin":1446,"end":1449},"obj":"Disease"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"NIN would add strong authority, infrastructure, investment, and external advisory mechanisms for nutrition research to the nation's largest funder of science. NIN would require a Federal Advisory Committee (Council) and would have a budget and funding authority. NIN would allow NIH to better address nutrition science that is cross-cutting rather than disease-specific, both across institutes, centers, and offices within NIH and with other federal departments and agencies. For example, the NIN would be instrumental in implementing and achieving the goals of the new 2020–2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research (129). As a long-term structure, NIN's activities and benefits would provide both expected and unexpected returns over many decades, outlasting shorter-term options such as cross-agency initiatives and changing priorities of individual administrations, and evolving appropriately with changes in science, food systems, nutritional needs, and disease conditions of the US public. A new institute could help maintain the strength of NIH focus on laboratory and clinical research in nutrition while, at the same time, facilitating expansion to research efforts to other translational priorities across NIH and across other federal departments and agencies. As has been seen with NIH research overall, NIN's coordinated leadership, structure, and capacity would likely provide a strong ROI to the US economy. The combination of NIN plus a new cross-governmental approach (Table 3) would provide a powerful strategy to address the scope and scale of the challenges and opportunities we face as a nation."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T1047","span":{"begin":0,"end":158},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T1048","span":{"begin":159,"end":262},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T1049","span":{"begin":263,"end":475},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T1050","span":{"begin":476,"end":628},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T1051","span":{"begin":629,"end":1000},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T1052","span":{"begin":1001,"end":1275},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T1053","span":{"begin":1276,"end":1426},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T1054","span":{"begin":1427,"end":1620},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"NIN would add strong authority, infrastructure, investment, and external advisory mechanisms for nutrition research to the nation's largest funder of science. NIN would require a Federal Advisory Committee (Council) and would have a budget and funding authority. NIN would allow NIH to better address nutrition science that is cross-cutting rather than disease-specific, both across institutes, centers, and offices within NIH and with other federal departments and agencies. For example, the NIN would be instrumental in implementing and achieving the goals of the new 2020–2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research (129). As a long-term structure, NIN's activities and benefits would provide both expected and unexpected returns over many decades, outlasting shorter-term options such as cross-agency initiatives and changing priorities of individual administrations, and evolving appropriately with changes in science, food systems, nutritional needs, and disease conditions of the US public. A new institute could help maintain the strength of NIH focus on laboratory and clinical research in nutrition while, at the same time, facilitating expansion to research efforts to other translational priorities across NIH and across other federal departments and agencies. As has been seen with NIH research overall, NIN's coordinated leadership, structure, and capacity would likely provide a strong ROI to the US economy. The combination of NIN plus a new cross-governmental approach (Table 3) would provide a powerful strategy to address the scope and scale of the challenges and opportunities we face as a nation."}