PMC:7441788 / 6223-6445
Annnotations
LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T21","span":{"begin":15,"end":19},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A21","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T21","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma68646"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-PD-MONDO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T54","span":{"begin":57,"end":66},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T55","span":{"begin":103,"end":111},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A54","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T54","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A55","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T55","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-PD-CLO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T62","span":{"begin":15,"end":24},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0000031"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-PD-CHEBI
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T75","span":{"begin":128,"end":130},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A75","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T75","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_3638"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-sample-CHEBI
{"project":"LitCovid-sample-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T51","span":{"begin":128,"end":130},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A51","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T51","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_3638"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-sample-PD-NCBITaxon
{"project":"LitCovid-sample-PD-NCBITaxon","denotations":[{"id":"T61","span":{"begin":103,"end":113},"obj":"Species"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A61","pred":"ncbi_taxonomy_id","subj":"T61","obj":"NCBItxid:2697049"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"NCBItxid","uri":"http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/NCBITAXON/"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-sample-Pubtator
{"project":"LitCovid-sample-Pubtator","denotations":[{"id":"279","span":{"begin":159,"end":161},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"291","span":{"begin":103,"end":113},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"297","span":{"begin":128,"end":130},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"298","span":{"begin":195,"end":198},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"306","span":{"begin":57,"end":66},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A279","pred":"pubann:denotes","subj":"279","obj":"Gene:56925"},{"id":"A291","pred":"pubann:denotes","subj":"291","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A297","pred":"pubann:denotes","subj":"297","obj":"MESH:D002738"},{"id":"A298","pred":"pubann:denotes","subj":"298","obj":"MESH:D006886"},{"id":"A306","pred":"pubann:denotes","subj":"306","obj":"MESH:D007239"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-sample-PD-IDO
{"project":"LitCovid-sample-PD-IDO","denotations":[{"id":"T49","span":{"begin":15,"end":19},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000000"},{"id":"T50","span":{"begin":57,"end":66},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IDO_0000586"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-sample-PD-FMA
{"project":"LitCovid-sample-PD-FMA","denotations":[{"id":"T21","span":{"begin":15,"end":19},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A21","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T21","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma68646"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-sample-PD-MONDO
{"project":"LitCovid-sample-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T47","span":{"begin":57,"end":66},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T48","span":{"begin":103,"end":113},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A47","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T47","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A48","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T48","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}
LitCovid-PubTator
{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"279","span":{"begin":159,"end":161},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"291","span":{"begin":103,"end":113},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"297","span":{"begin":128,"end":130},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"298","span":{"begin":195,"end":198},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"306","span":{"begin":57,"end":66},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A279","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"279","obj":"Gene:56925"},{"id":"A291","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"291","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A297","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"297","obj":"MESH:D002738"},{"id":"A298","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"298","obj":"MESH:D006886"},{"id":"A306","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"306","obj":"MESH:D007239"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"]. In the same cell line, at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs, 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8) of SARS-CoV-2, the EC50 for CQ (2.71, 3.81, 7.14, and 7.36 μM) was slightly lower than that of HCQ (4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and"}