PMC:7386785 / 32987-33936 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T168","span":{"begin":843,"end":865},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T169","span":{"begin":867,"end":875},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A168","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T168","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0004995"},{"id":"A169","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T169","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005015"}],"text":"Studies may have excluded participants, or selected participants in such a way that they avoided including those who were difficult to diagnose or likely to be borderline. Although the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be different for the different index tests, inappropriate exclusions and inclusions will be similar for all index tests: for example, only elderly patients excluded, or children (as sampling may be more difficult). This needs to be addressed on a case‐by‐case basis.YES: if a high proportion of eligible patients was included without clear selection.NO: if a high proportion of eligible patients was excluded without providing a reason; if, in a retrospective study, participants without index test or reference standard results were excluded; if exclusion was based on severity assessment post‐factum or comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, immunosuppression).UNCLEAR: if the exclusion criteria were not reported."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T53773","span":{"begin":73,"end":74},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T54033","span":{"begin":260,"end":265},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T55971","span":{"begin":337,"end":342},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T14540","span":{"begin":468,"end":469},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T58989","span":{"begin":497,"end":498},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T57995","span":{"begin":580,"end":581},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T7209","span":{"begin":650,"end":651},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T85195","span":{"begin":667,"end":668},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T45722","span":{"begin":717,"end":721},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"}],"text":"Studies may have excluded participants, or selected participants in such a way that they avoided including those who were difficult to diagnose or likely to be borderline. Although the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be different for the different index tests, inappropriate exclusions and inclusions will be similar for all index tests: for example, only elderly patients excluded, or children (as sampling may be more difficult). This needs to be addressed on a case‐by‐case basis.YES: if a high proportion of eligible patients was included without clear selection.NO: if a high proportion of eligible patients was excluded without providing a reason; if, in a retrospective study, participants without index test or reference standard results were excluded; if exclusion was based on severity assessment post‐factum or comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, immunosuppression).UNCLEAR: if the exclusion criteria were not reported."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T89","span":{"begin":843,"end":865},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A89","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T89","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0001626"}],"text":"Studies may have excluded participants, or selected participants in such a way that they avoided including those who were difficult to diagnose or likely to be borderline. Although the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be different for the different index tests, inappropriate exclusions and inclusions will be similar for all index tests: for example, only elderly patients excluded, or children (as sampling may be more difficult). This needs to be addressed on a case‐by‐case basis.YES: if a high proportion of eligible patients was included without clear selection.NO: if a high proportion of eligible patients was excluded without providing a reason; if, in a retrospective study, participants without index test or reference standard results were excluded; if exclusion was based on severity assessment post‐factum or comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, immunosuppression).UNCLEAR: if the exclusion criteria were not reported."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T355","span":{"begin":0,"end":171},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T356","span":{"begin":172,"end":437},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T357","span":{"begin":438,"end":949},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Studies may have excluded participants, or selected participants in such a way that they avoided including those who were difficult to diagnose or likely to be borderline. Although the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be different for the different index tests, inappropriate exclusions and inclusions will be similar for all index tests: for example, only elderly patients excluded, or children (as sampling may be more difficult). This needs to be addressed on a case‐by‐case basis.YES: if a high proportion of eligible patients was included without clear selection.NO: if a high proportion of eligible patients was excluded without providing a reason; if, in a retrospective study, participants without index test or reference standard results were excluded; if exclusion was based on severity assessment post‐factum or comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, immunosuppression).UNCLEAR: if the exclusion criteria were not reported."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"679","span":{"begin":26,"end":38},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"680","span":{"begin":52,"end":64},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"681","span":{"begin":370,"end":378},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"682","span":{"begin":392,"end":400},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"683","span":{"begin":527,"end":535},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"684","span":{"begin":610,"end":618},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"685","span":{"begin":690,"end":702},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"710","span":{"begin":843,"end":865},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"711","span":{"begin":867,"end":875},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A679","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"679","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A680","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"680","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A681","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"681","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A682","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"682","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A683","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"683","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A684","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"684","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A685","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"685","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A710","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"710","obj":"MESH:D002318"},{"id":"A711","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"711","obj":"MESH:D003920"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Studies may have excluded participants, or selected participants in such a way that they avoided including those who were difficult to diagnose or likely to be borderline. Although the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be different for the different index tests, inappropriate exclusions and inclusions will be similar for all index tests: for example, only elderly patients excluded, or children (as sampling may be more difficult). This needs to be addressed on a case‐by‐case basis.YES: if a high proportion of eligible patients was included without clear selection.NO: if a high proportion of eligible patients was excluded without providing a reason; if, in a retrospective study, participants without index test or reference standard results were excluded; if exclusion was based on severity assessment post‐factum or comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, immunosuppression).UNCLEAR: if the exclusion criteria were not reported."}