PMC:7288617 / 4690-4955 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T48","span":{"begin":6,"end":14},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A48","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T48","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"}],"text":"s for SARS-CoV affected patients (Baig et al. 2020). We did not find any presence of anti-GQ1b, usually explaining the symptoms of the disease (Wakerley et al. 2014). However, negative results for anti-GQ1b tests have been previously reported (Wattanasit and Sathir"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T49","span":{"begin":207,"end":212},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"}],"text":"s for SARS-CoV affected patients (Baig et al. 2020). We did not find any presence of anti-GQ1b, usually explaining the symptoms of the disease (Wakerley et al. 2014). However, negative results for anti-GQ1b tests have been previously reported (Wattanasit and Sathir"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T24","span":{"begin":90,"end":94},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T25","span":{"begin":202,"end":206},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A24","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T24","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_27515"},{"id":"A25","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T25","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_27515"}],"text":"s for SARS-CoV affected patients (Baig et al. 2020). We did not find any presence of anti-GQ1b, usually explaining the symptoms of the disease (Wakerley et al. 2014). However, negative results for anti-GQ1b tests have been previously reported (Wattanasit and Sathir"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-GlycoEpitope","denotations":[{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":90,"end":94},"obj":"GlycoEpitope"},{"id":"T9","span":{"begin":202,"end":206},"obj":"GlycoEpitope"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A8","pred":"glyco_epitope_db_id","subj":"T8","obj":"http://www.glycoepitope.jp/epitopes/EP0069"},{"id":"A9","pred":"glyco_epitope_db_id","subj":"T9","obj":"http://www.glycoepitope.jp/epitopes/EP0069"}],"text":"s for SARS-CoV affected patients (Baig et al. 2020). We did not find any presence of anti-GQ1b, usually explaining the symptoms of the disease (Wakerley et al. 2014). However, negative results for anti-GQ1b tests have been previously reported (Wattanasit and Sathir"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T36","span":{"begin":46,"end":52},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T37","span":{"begin":53,"end":159},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T38","span":{"begin":160,"end":166},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"s for SARS-CoV affected patients (Baig et al. 2020). We did not find any presence of anti-GQ1b, usually explaining the symptoms of the disease (Wakerley et al. 2014). However, negative results for anti-GQ1b tests have been previously reported (Wattanasit and Sathir"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"129","span":{"begin":6,"end":14},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"130","span":{"begin":24,"end":32},"obj":"Species"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A129","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"129","obj":"Tax:694009"},{"id":"A130","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"130","obj":"Tax:9606"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"s for SARS-CoV affected patients (Baig et al. 2020). We did not find any presence of anti-GQ1b, usually explaining the symptoms of the disease (Wakerley et al. 2014). However, negative results for anti-GQ1b tests have been previously reported (Wattanasit and Sathir"}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32529516-32167747-63346693","span":{"begin":46,"end":50},"obj":"32167747"},{"id":"32529516-25072194-63346694","span":{"begin":160,"end":164},"obj":"25072194"}],"text":"s for SARS-CoV affected patients (Baig et al. 2020). We did not find any presence of anti-GQ1b, usually explaining the symptoms of the disease (Wakerley et al. 2014). However, negative results for anti-GQ1b tests have been previously reported (Wattanasit and Sathir"}