PMC:7283670 / 29187-30888
Annnotations
LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T47668","span":{"begin":809,"end":814},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T97866","span":{"begin":1492,"end":1498},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T6958","span":{"begin":1502,"end":1507},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A6957","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T47668","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma9576"},{"id":"A45997","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T97866","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma312401"},{"id":"A86853","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T6958","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma9670"}],"text":"5.2 Epidemiological history\nShortly after the onset of the epidemic, The National Health Commission of China (Committee, 2020a; Organization, 2020a) initiated the Diagnosis and Treatment Program of COVID‐19‐associated pneumonia, following the guidelines provided by WHO on SARS and MERS (Azhar \u0026 EI‐Kafrawy, 2014; Organization, 2017, 2020b).\nAccording to the newly formulated criteria, a “suspected case” is defined as a patient with epidemiological history, that is traveling and contact, and two clinical findings pertinent to the disease. If, however, an epidemiological history is not confirmed, then the patient must present at least three clinical findings to be considered as a suspected case. Based on the Trial, Fifth Edition (Committee, 2020b), pathologic findings indicative of viral pneumonia on chest CT scans provide enough evidence for clinical diagnosis of COVID‐19. Nonetheless, as of February 17, 2020, WHO does not approve of any diagnosis based solely on radiologic findings, without obtaining an RT‐PCR test from the patient (Organization, 2020c). In the more recent revision of the Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Program, 6th Edition, the term “clinical diagnosis” was removed and replaced with “etiological diagnosis” (Organization, 2020a). According to the recent revision, it is imperative that an etiological diagnosis of COVID‐19 is made at first, which can then be complemented by a positive real‐time RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2, which is duly performed on the sputum or blood sample of the patient. After the final diagnosis is made, confirmed patients are categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, based on the severity of disease (Zu et al., 2020)."}
LitCovid-PD-UBERON
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T57","span":{"begin":809,"end":814},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T58","span":{"begin":1492,"end":1498},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T59","span":{"begin":1502,"end":1507},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A57","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T57","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001443"},{"id":"A58","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T58","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0007311"},{"id":"A59","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T59","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000178"}],"text":"5.2 Epidemiological history\nShortly after the onset of the epidemic, The National Health Commission of China (Committee, 2020a; Organization, 2020a) initiated the Diagnosis and Treatment Program of COVID‐19‐associated pneumonia, following the guidelines provided by WHO on SARS and MERS (Azhar \u0026 EI‐Kafrawy, 2014; Organization, 2017, 2020b).\nAccording to the newly formulated criteria, a “suspected case” is defined as a patient with epidemiological history, that is traveling and contact, and two clinical findings pertinent to the disease. If, however, an epidemiological history is not confirmed, then the patient must present at least three clinical findings to be considered as a suspected case. Based on the Trial, Fifth Edition (Committee, 2020b), pathologic findings indicative of viral pneumonia on chest CT scans provide enough evidence for clinical diagnosis of COVID‐19. Nonetheless, as of February 17, 2020, WHO does not approve of any diagnosis based solely on radiologic findings, without obtaining an RT‐PCR test from the patient (Organization, 2020c). In the more recent revision of the Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Program, 6th Edition, the term “clinical diagnosis” was removed and replaced with “etiological diagnosis” (Organization, 2020a). According to the recent revision, it is imperative that an etiological diagnosis of COVID‐19 is made at first, which can then be complemented by a positive real‐time RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2, which is duly performed on the sputum or blood sample of the patient. After the final diagnosis is made, confirmed patients are categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, based on the severity of disease (Zu et al., 2020)."}
LitCovid-PD-MONDO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T170","span":{"begin":199,"end":207},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T171","span":{"begin":219,"end":228},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T172","span":{"begin":274,"end":278},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T173","span":{"begin":297,"end":299},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T174","span":{"begin":790,"end":805},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T175","span":{"begin":796,"end":805},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T176","span":{"begin":874,"end":882},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T177","span":{"begin":1350,"end":1358},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T178","span":{"begin":1449,"end":1453},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A170","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T170","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"},{"id":"A171","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T171","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005249"},{"id":"A172","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T172","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A173","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T173","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0007239"},{"id":"A174","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T174","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0006012"},{"id":"A175","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T175","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005249"},{"id":"A176","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T176","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"},{"id":"A177","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T177","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"},{"id":"A178","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T178","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"}],"text":"5.2 Epidemiological history\nShortly after the onset of the epidemic, The National Health Commission of China (Committee, 2020a; Organization, 2020a) initiated the Diagnosis and Treatment Program of COVID‐19‐associated pneumonia, following the guidelines provided by WHO on SARS and MERS (Azhar \u0026 EI‐Kafrawy, 2014; Organization, 2017, 2020b).\nAccording to the newly formulated criteria, a “suspected case” is defined as a patient with epidemiological history, that is traveling and contact, and two clinical findings pertinent to the disease. If, however, an epidemiological history is not confirmed, then the patient must present at least three clinical findings to be considered as a suspected case. Based on the Trial, Fifth Edition (Committee, 2020b), pathologic findings indicative of viral pneumonia on chest CT scans provide enough evidence for clinical diagnosis of COVID‐19. Nonetheless, as of February 17, 2020, WHO does not approve of any diagnosis based solely on radiologic findings, without obtaining an RT‐PCR test from the patient (Organization, 2020c). In the more recent revision of the Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Program, 6th Edition, the term “clinical diagnosis” was removed and replaced with “etiological diagnosis” (Organization, 2020a). According to the recent revision, it is imperative that an etiological diagnosis of COVID‐19 is made at first, which can then be complemented by a positive real‐time RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2, which is duly performed on the sputum or blood sample of the patient. After the final diagnosis is made, confirmed patients are categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, based on the severity of disease (Zu et al., 2020)."}
LitCovid-PD-CLO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T294","span":{"begin":129,"end":141},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000245"},{"id":"T295","span":{"begin":315,"end":327},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000245"},{"id":"T296","span":{"begin":387,"end":388},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T297","span":{"begin":420,"end":421},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T298","span":{"begin":684,"end":685},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T299","span":{"begin":809,"end":814},"obj":"http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0000965"},{"id":"T300","span":{"begin":1025,"end":1029},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T301","span":{"begin":1048,"end":1060},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000245"},{"id":"T302","span":{"begin":1244,"end":1256},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000245"},{"id":"T303","span":{"begin":1411,"end":1412},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T304","span":{"begin":1502,"end":1507},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000178"},{"id":"T305","span":{"begin":1502,"end":1507},"obj":"http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0000296"}],"text":"5.2 Epidemiological history\nShortly after the onset of the epidemic, The National Health Commission of China (Committee, 2020a; Organization, 2020a) initiated the Diagnosis and Treatment Program of COVID‐19‐associated pneumonia, following the guidelines provided by WHO on SARS and MERS (Azhar \u0026 EI‐Kafrawy, 2014; Organization, 2017, 2020b).\nAccording to the newly formulated criteria, a “suspected case” is defined as a patient with epidemiological history, that is traveling and contact, and two clinical findings pertinent to the disease. If, however, an epidemiological history is not confirmed, then the patient must present at least three clinical findings to be considered as a suspected case. Based on the Trial, Fifth Edition (Committee, 2020b), pathologic findings indicative of viral pneumonia on chest CT scans provide enough evidence for clinical diagnosis of COVID‐19. Nonetheless, as of February 17, 2020, WHO does not approve of any diagnosis based solely on radiologic findings, without obtaining an RT‐PCR test from the patient (Organization, 2020c). In the more recent revision of the Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Program, 6th Edition, the term “clinical diagnosis” was removed and replaced with “etiological diagnosis” (Organization, 2020a). According to the recent revision, it is imperative that an etiological diagnosis of COVID‐19 is made at first, which can then be complemented by a positive real‐time RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2, which is duly performed on the sputum or blood sample of the patient. After the final diagnosis is made, confirmed patients are categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, based on the severity of disease (Zu et al., 2020)."}
LitCovid-PD-CHEBI
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T65","span":{"begin":297,"end":299},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A65","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T65","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_141436"},{"id":"A66","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T65","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_30969"}],"text":"5.2 Epidemiological history\nShortly after the onset of the epidemic, The National Health Commission of China (Committee, 2020a; Organization, 2020a) initiated the Diagnosis and Treatment Program of COVID‐19‐associated pneumonia, following the guidelines provided by WHO on SARS and MERS (Azhar \u0026 EI‐Kafrawy, 2014; Organization, 2017, 2020b).\nAccording to the newly formulated criteria, a “suspected case” is defined as a patient with epidemiological history, that is traveling and contact, and two clinical findings pertinent to the disease. If, however, an epidemiological history is not confirmed, then the patient must present at least three clinical findings to be considered as a suspected case. Based on the Trial, Fifth Edition (Committee, 2020b), pathologic findings indicative of viral pneumonia on chest CT scans provide enough evidence for clinical diagnosis of COVID‐19. Nonetheless, as of February 17, 2020, WHO does not approve of any diagnosis based solely on radiologic findings, without obtaining an RT‐PCR test from the patient (Organization, 2020c). In the more recent revision of the Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Program, 6th Edition, the term “clinical diagnosis” was removed and replaced with “etiological diagnosis” (Organization, 2020a). According to the recent revision, it is imperative that an etiological diagnosis of COVID‐19 is made at first, which can then be complemented by a positive real‐time RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2, which is duly performed on the sputum or blood sample of the patient. After the final diagnosis is made, confirmed patients are categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, based on the severity of disease (Zu et al., 2020)."}
LitCovid-sentences
{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T232","span":{"begin":0,"end":28},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T233","span":{"begin":29,"end":342},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T234","span":{"begin":343,"end":542},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T235","span":{"begin":543,"end":701},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T236","span":{"begin":702,"end":883},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T237","span":{"begin":884,"end":1069},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T238","span":{"begin":1070,"end":1265},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T239","span":{"begin":1266,"end":1530},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T240","span":{"begin":1531,"end":1701},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"5.2 Epidemiological history\nShortly after the onset of the epidemic, The National Health Commission of China (Committee, 2020a; Organization, 2020a) initiated the Diagnosis and Treatment Program of COVID‐19‐associated pneumonia, following the guidelines provided by WHO on SARS and MERS (Azhar \u0026 EI‐Kafrawy, 2014; Organization, 2017, 2020b).\nAccording to the newly formulated criteria, a “suspected case” is defined as a patient with epidemiological history, that is traveling and contact, and two clinical findings pertinent to the disease. If, however, an epidemiological history is not confirmed, then the patient must present at least three clinical findings to be considered as a suspected case. Based on the Trial, Fifth Edition (Committee, 2020b), pathologic findings indicative of viral pneumonia on chest CT scans provide enough evidence for clinical diagnosis of COVID‐19. Nonetheless, as of February 17, 2020, WHO does not approve of any diagnosis based solely on radiologic findings, without obtaining an RT‐PCR test from the patient (Organization, 2020c). In the more recent revision of the Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Program, 6th Edition, the term “clinical diagnosis” was removed and replaced with “etiological diagnosis” (Organization, 2020a). According to the recent revision, it is imperative that an etiological diagnosis of COVID‐19 is made at first, which can then be complemented by a positive real‐time RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2, which is duly performed on the sputum or blood sample of the patient. After the final diagnosis is made, confirmed patients are categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, based on the severity of disease (Zu et al., 2020)."}
LitCovid-PD-HP
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T76","span":{"begin":219,"end":228},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T77","span":{"begin":796,"end":805},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A76","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T76","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0002090"},{"id":"A77","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T77","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0002090"}],"text":"5.2 Epidemiological history\nShortly after the onset of the epidemic, The National Health Commission of China (Committee, 2020a; Organization, 2020a) initiated the Diagnosis and Treatment Program of COVID‐19‐associated pneumonia, following the guidelines provided by WHO on SARS and MERS (Azhar \u0026 EI‐Kafrawy, 2014; Organization, 2017, 2020b).\nAccording to the newly formulated criteria, a “suspected case” is defined as a patient with epidemiological history, that is traveling and contact, and two clinical findings pertinent to the disease. If, however, an epidemiological history is not confirmed, then the patient must present at least three clinical findings to be considered as a suspected case. Based on the Trial, Fifth Edition (Committee, 2020b), pathologic findings indicative of viral pneumonia on chest CT scans provide enough evidence for clinical diagnosis of COVID‐19. Nonetheless, as of February 17, 2020, WHO does not approve of any diagnosis based solely on radiologic findings, without obtaining an RT‐PCR test from the patient (Organization, 2020c). In the more recent revision of the Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Program, 6th Edition, the term “clinical diagnosis” was removed and replaced with “etiological diagnosis” (Organization, 2020a). According to the recent revision, it is imperative that an etiological diagnosis of COVID‐19 is made at first, which can then be complemented by a positive real‐time RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2, which is duly performed on the sputum or blood sample of the patient. After the final diagnosis is made, confirmed patients are categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, based on the severity of disease (Zu et al., 2020)."}
LitCovid-PubTator
{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"716","span":{"begin":199,"end":207},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"717","span":{"begin":219,"end":228},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"727","span":{"begin":422,"end":429},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"728","span":{"begin":610,"end":617},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"729","span":{"begin":1039,"end":1046},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"730","span":{"begin":1449,"end":1459},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"731","span":{"begin":1522,"end":1529},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"732","span":{"begin":1576,"end":1584},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"733","span":{"begin":790,"end":805},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"734","span":{"begin":874,"end":882},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"735","span":{"begin":1350,"end":1358},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A716","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"716","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A717","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"717","obj":"MESH:D011014"},{"id":"A727","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"727","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A728","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"728","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A729","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"729","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A730","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"730","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A731","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"731","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A732","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"732","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A734","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"734","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A735","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"735","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"5.2 Epidemiological history\nShortly after the onset of the epidemic, The National Health Commission of China (Committee, 2020a; Organization, 2020a) initiated the Diagnosis and Treatment Program of COVID‐19‐associated pneumonia, following the guidelines provided by WHO on SARS and MERS (Azhar \u0026 EI‐Kafrawy, 2014; Organization, 2017, 2020b).\nAccording to the newly formulated criteria, a “suspected case” is defined as a patient with epidemiological history, that is traveling and contact, and two clinical findings pertinent to the disease. If, however, an epidemiological history is not confirmed, then the patient must present at least three clinical findings to be considered as a suspected case. Based on the Trial, Fifth Edition (Committee, 2020b), pathologic findings indicative of viral pneumonia on chest CT scans provide enough evidence for clinical diagnosis of COVID‐19. Nonetheless, as of February 17, 2020, WHO does not approve of any diagnosis based solely on radiologic findings, without obtaining an RT‐PCR test from the patient (Organization, 2020c). In the more recent revision of the Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Program, 6th Edition, the term “clinical diagnosis” was removed and replaced with “etiological diagnosis” (Organization, 2020a). According to the recent revision, it is imperative that an etiological diagnosis of COVID‐19 is made at first, which can then be complemented by a positive real‐time RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2, which is duly performed on the sputum or blood sample of the patient. After the final diagnosis is made, confirmed patients are categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, based on the severity of disease (Zu et al., 2020)."}