PMC:7267510 / 47615-48075 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T280","span":{"begin":142,"end":155},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T281","span":{"begin":218,"end":245},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A280","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T280","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma280881"},{"id":"A281","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T281","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma71731"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T265","span":{"begin":142,"end":146},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T266","span":{"begin":151,"end":155},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T267","span":{"begin":218,"end":245},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T268","span":{"begin":234,"end":239},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A265","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T265","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000033"},{"id":"A266","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T266","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000974"},{"id":"A267","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T267","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0015869"},{"id":"A268","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T268","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002391"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T379","span":{"begin":142,"end":161},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T380","span":{"begin":151,"end":161},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T381","span":{"begin":156,"end":161},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A379","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T379","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005586"},{"id":"A380","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T380","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0021351"},{"id":"A381","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T381","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005070"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T606","span":{"begin":142,"end":146},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000033"},{"id":"T607","span":{"begin":142,"end":146},"obj":"http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0000964"},{"id":"T608","span":{"begin":151,"end":155},"obj":"http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0000967"},{"id":"T609","span":{"begin":234,"end":245},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000029"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T82","span":{"begin":31,"end":39},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T83","span":{"begin":64,"end":67},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T84","span":{"begin":314,"end":317},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A82","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T82","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_30225"},{"id":"A83","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T83","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_131701"},{"id":"A84","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T84","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_131701"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T25","span":{"begin":357,"end":363},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0098739"},{"id":"T26","span":{"begin":357,"end":363},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0098657"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T179","span":{"begin":142,"end":161},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A179","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T179","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0012288"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T365","span":{"begin":0,"end":173},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T366","span":{"begin":174,"end":309},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T367","span":{"begin":310,"end":394},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T368","span":{"begin":395,"end":460},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"682","span":{"begin":338,"end":356},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"683","span":{"begin":151,"end":161},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A682","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"682","obj":"MESH:D019788"},{"id":"A683","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"683","obj":"MESH:D006258"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"We advised contrasted MRI, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET‐CT) to further evaluate, along with presentation at our multidisciplinary head and neck tumor conference. The MRI showed the well‐encapsulated cystic retropharyngeal lymph nodes more distinctly (Figure 3), with 2 cm as the largest dimension. The PET‐CT was negative for fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, suggesting low‐grade lesions. The retropharyngeal lesions were felt to be inaccessible for FNA."}