PMC:7265102 / 2000-3296 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"36","span":{"begin":300,"end":307},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"37","span":{"begin":92,"end":100},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"41","span":{"begin":930,"end":938},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"42","span":{"begin":1132,"end":1140},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"43","span":{"begin":1215,"end":1223},"obj":"Species"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A36","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"36","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A37","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"37","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A41","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"41","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A42","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"42","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A43","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"43","obj":"Tax:9606"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Prioritisation\nPrioritisation for the allocation of scarce resources is not confined to the COVID-19 outbreak. Transplant organs are examples of scarce resources where prioritisation criteria for allocation are common and physicians have to make a case-by-case evaluation in order to establish which patient receives the organ. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand happens to exceed supply. Discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified, for example sex mismatch might influence the outcome of a heart transplant.[3,4]\nPrioritisation does not mean that one life is more valuable than another, as all lives are equally valuable. When resources are insufficient to save all those in need, prioritisation means allocating the available assets in the most effective way. This method allows priority treatment of patients more likely to benefit from the scarce resource. Prioritisation should be as objective as possible but also flexible to changes in clinical situation. Transparent mechanisms to determine which patients will receive a specific resource are desirable and should be explained to patients who finally receive an organ, to those who are denied and to the public."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":321,"end":326},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":618,"end":623},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":1247,"end":1252},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T1","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma67498"},{"id":"A2","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T2","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma7088"},{"id":"A3","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T3","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma67498"}],"text":"Prioritisation\nPrioritisation for the allocation of scarce resources is not confined to the COVID-19 outbreak. Transplant organs are examples of scarce resources where prioritisation criteria for allocation are common and physicians have to make a case-by-case evaluation in order to establish which patient receives the organ. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand happens to exceed supply. Discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified, for example sex mismatch might influence the outcome of a heart transplant.[3,4]\nPrioritisation does not mean that one life is more valuable than another, as all lives are equally valuable. When resources are insufficient to save all those in need, prioritisation means allocating the available assets in the most effective way. This method allows priority treatment of patients more likely to benefit from the scarce resource. Prioritisation should be as objective as possible but also flexible to changes in clinical situation. Transparent mechanisms to determine which patients will receive a specific resource are desirable and should be explained to patients who finally receive an organ, to those who are denied and to the public."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":122,"end":128},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":321,"end":326},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":618,"end":623},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":1247,"end":1252},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T1","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000062"},{"id":"A2","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T2","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000062"},{"id":"A3","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T3","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000948"},{"id":"A4","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T4","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000062"}],"text":"Prioritisation\nPrioritisation for the allocation of scarce resources is not confined to the COVID-19 outbreak. Transplant organs are examples of scarce resources where prioritisation criteria for allocation are common and physicians have to make a case-by-case evaluation in order to establish which patient receives the organ. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand happens to exceed supply. Discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified, for example sex mismatch might influence the outcome of a heart transplant.[3,4]\nPrioritisation does not mean that one life is more valuable than another, as all lives are equally valuable. When resources are insufficient to save all those in need, prioritisation means allocating the available assets in the most effective way. This method allows priority treatment of patients more likely to benefit from the scarce resource. Prioritisation should be as objective as possible but also flexible to changes in clinical situation. Transparent mechanisms to determine which patients will receive a specific resource are desirable and should be explained to patients who finally receive an organ, to those who are denied and to the public."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T15","span":{"begin":92,"end":100},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A15","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T15","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"}],"text":"Prioritisation\nPrioritisation for the allocation of scarce resources is not confined to the COVID-19 outbreak. Transplant organs are examples of scarce resources where prioritisation criteria for allocation are common and physicians have to make a case-by-case evaluation in order to establish which patient receives the organ. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand happens to exceed supply. Discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified, for example sex mismatch might influence the outcome of a heart transplant.[3,4]\nPrioritisation does not mean that one life is more valuable than another, as all lives are equally valuable. When resources are insufficient to save all those in need, prioritisation means allocating the available assets in the most effective way. This method allows priority treatment of patients more likely to benefit from the scarce resource. Prioritisation should be as objective as possible but also flexible to changes in clinical situation. Transparent mechanisms to determine which patients will receive a specific resource are desirable and should be explained to patients who finally receive an organ, to those who are denied and to the public."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":122,"end":128},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003103"},{"id":"T9","span":{"begin":246,"end":247},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T10","span":{"begin":321,"end":326},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003103"},{"id":"T11","span":{"begin":504,"end":507},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582"},{"id":"T12","span":{"begin":616,"end":617},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T13","span":{"begin":618,"end":623},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000948"},{"id":"T14","span":{"begin":618,"end":623},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0007100"},{"id":"T15","span":{"begin":618,"end":623},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0015228"},{"id":"T16","span":{"begin":618,"end":623},"obj":"http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0000815"},{"id":"T17","span":{"begin":1016,"end":1025},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000030"},{"id":"T18","span":{"begin":1154,"end":1155},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T19","span":{"begin":1247,"end":1252},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003103"}],"text":"Prioritisation\nPrioritisation for the allocation of scarce resources is not confined to the COVID-19 outbreak. Transplant organs are examples of scarce resources where prioritisation criteria for allocation are common and physicians have to make a case-by-case evaluation in order to establish which patient receives the organ. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand happens to exceed supply. Discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified, for example sex mismatch might influence the outcome of a heart transplant.[3,4]\nPrioritisation does not mean that one life is more valuable than another, as all lives are equally valuable. When resources are insufficient to save all those in need, prioritisation means allocating the available assets in the most effective way. This method allows priority treatment of patients more likely to benefit from the scarce resource. Prioritisation should be as objective as possible but also flexible to changes in clinical situation. Transparent mechanisms to determine which patients will receive a specific resource are desirable and should be explained to patients who finally receive an organ, to those who are denied and to the public."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T19","span":{"begin":0,"end":14},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T20","span":{"begin":15,"end":110},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T21","span":{"begin":111,"end":327},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T22","span":{"begin":328,"end":462},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T23","span":{"begin":463,"end":640},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T24","span":{"begin":641,"end":749},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T25","span":{"begin":750,"end":888},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T26","span":{"begin":889,"end":987},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T27","span":{"begin":988,"end":1089},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T28","span":{"begin":1090,"end":1296},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Prioritisation\nPrioritisation for the allocation of scarce resources is not confined to the COVID-19 outbreak. Transplant organs are examples of scarce resources where prioritisation criteria for allocation are common and physicians have to make a case-by-case evaluation in order to establish which patient receives the organ. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand happens to exceed supply. Discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified, for example sex mismatch might influence the outcome of a heart transplant.[3,4]\nPrioritisation does not mean that one life is more valuable than another, as all lives are equally valuable. When resources are insufficient to save all those in need, prioritisation means allocating the available assets in the most effective way. This method allows priority treatment of patients more likely to benefit from the scarce resource. Prioritisation should be as objective as possible but also flexible to changes in clinical situation. Transparent mechanisms to determine which patients will receive a specific resource are desirable and should be explained to patients who finally receive an organ, to those who are denied and to the public."}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32514316-31630456-28782515","span":{"begin":636,"end":637},"obj":"31630456"},{"id":"32514316-25399778-28782516","span":{"begin":638,"end":639},"obj":"25399778"}],"text":"Prioritisation\nPrioritisation for the allocation of scarce resources is not confined to the COVID-19 outbreak. Transplant organs are examples of scarce resources where prioritisation criteria for allocation are common and physicians have to make a case-by-case evaluation in order to establish which patient receives the organ. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand happens to exceed supply. Discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified, for example sex mismatch might influence the outcome of a heart transplant.[3,4]\nPrioritisation does not mean that one life is more valuable than another, as all lives are equally valuable. When resources are insufficient to save all those in need, prioritisation means allocating the available assets in the most effective way. This method allows priority treatment of patients more likely to benefit from the scarce resource. Prioritisation should be as objective as possible but also flexible to changes in clinical situation. Transparent mechanisms to determine which patients will receive a specific resource are desirable and should be explained to patients who finally receive an organ, to those who are denied and to the public."}

{"project":"MyTest","denotations":[{"id":"32514316-31630456-28782515","span":{"begin":636,"end":637},"obj":"31630456"},{"id":"32514316-25399778-28782516","span":{"begin":638,"end":639},"obj":"25399778"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/testbase"},{"prefix":"UniProtKB","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/"},{"prefix":"uniprot","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/"}],"text":"Prioritisation\nPrioritisation for the allocation of scarce resources is not confined to the COVID-19 outbreak. Transplant organs are examples of scarce resources where prioritisation criteria for allocation are common and physicians have to make a case-by-case evaluation in order to establish which patient receives the organ. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand happens to exceed supply. Discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified, for example sex mismatch might influence the outcome of a heart transplant.[3,4]\nPrioritisation does not mean that one life is more valuable than another, as all lives are equally valuable. When resources are insufficient to save all those in need, prioritisation means allocating the available assets in the most effective way. This method allows priority treatment of patients more likely to benefit from the scarce resource. Prioritisation should be as objective as possible but also flexible to changes in clinical situation. Transparent mechanisms to determine which patients will receive a specific resource are desirable and should be explained to patients who finally receive an organ, to those who are denied and to the public."}