PMC:7247483 / 3806-4107 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T26","span":{"begin":270,"end":286},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T27","span":{"begin":277,"end":286},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A26","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T26","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0002041"},{"id":"A27","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T27","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"}],"text":" 24.00 (6)\n50–64 57 12.28 (7) 8.77 (5) 1.75 (1) 21.05 (12)\n≥65 99 19.19 (19) 9.09 (9) 1.01 (1) 24.24 (24)\nThe main limitation of this retrospective study using the residual sera for analysis is the lack of clinical evaluation or other diagnostic approaches for possible fungal infection among these pa"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T32","span":{"begin":11,"end":58},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T33","span":{"begin":59,"end":105},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":" 24.00 (6)\n50–64 57 12.28 (7) 8.77 (5) 1.75 (1) 21.05 (12)\n≥65 99 19.19 (19) 9.09 (9) 1.01 (1) 24.24 (24)\nThe main limitation of this retrospective study using the residual sera for analysis is the lack of clinical evaluation or other diagnostic approaches for possible fungal infection among these pa"}