PMC:7241991 / 8254-9169 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"104","span":{"begin":583,"end":590},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"105","span":{"begin":266,"end":272},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A104","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"104","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A105","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"105","obj":"MESH:D003643"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"One possible reason that race keeps being reintroduced into health research is that one of its blue-sky goals is to have personalised medicine so precise that every person's biological profile is perfectly understood, avoiding adverse drug reactions and unnecessary deaths. In the greyer real world in which we don't have all the necessary data to do this, some doctors and researchers instead turn to social categories as proxies. They work on the assumption that certain groups share certain health traits on average, allowing them to roughly gauge the medical requirements of any patient belonging to that group. It feels like a useful step on the road to personalised medicine, some might argue. In my view, it is a fudge. Our social categories have enormous power in society, in dictating how we live and how we are treated by others, but this doesn't mean they have the same significance underneath our skins."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T38","span":{"begin":630,"end":631},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T39","span":{"begin":703,"end":705},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050475"},{"id":"T40","span":{"begin":718,"end":719},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T41","span":{"begin":909,"end":914},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000014"},{"id":"T42","span":{"begin":909,"end":914},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001003"},{"id":"T43","span":{"begin":909,"end":914},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002097"},{"id":"T44","span":{"begin":909,"end":914},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002199"},{"id":"T45","span":{"begin":909,"end":914},"obj":"http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0000962"}],"text":"One possible reason that race keeps being reintroduced into health research is that one of its blue-sky goals is to have personalised medicine so precise that every person's biological profile is perfectly understood, avoiding adverse drug reactions and unnecessary deaths. In the greyer real world in which we don't have all the necessary data to do this, some doctors and researchers instead turn to social categories as proxies. They work on the assumption that certain groups share certain health traits on average, allowing them to roughly gauge the medical requirements of any patient belonging to that group. It feels like a useful step on the road to personalised medicine, some might argue. In my view, it is a fudge. Our social categories have enormous power in society, in dictating how we live and how we are treated by others, but this doesn't mean they have the same significance underneath our skins."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T32","span":{"begin":134,"end":142},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T33","span":{"begin":235,"end":239},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T34","span":{"begin":609,"end":614},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T35","span":{"begin":672,"end":680},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A32","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T32","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_23888"},{"id":"A33","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T33","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_23888"},{"id":"A34","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T34","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24433"},{"id":"A35","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T35","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_23888"}],"text":"One possible reason that race keeps being reintroduced into health research is that one of its blue-sky goals is to have personalised medicine so precise that every person's biological profile is perfectly understood, avoiding adverse drug reactions and unnecessary deaths. In the greyer real world in which we don't have all the necessary data to do this, some doctors and researchers instead turn to social categories as proxies. They work on the assumption that certain groups share certain health traits on average, allowing them to roughly gauge the medical requirements of any patient belonging to that group. It feels like a useful step on the road to personalised medicine, some might argue. In my view, it is a fudge. Our social categories have enormous power in society, in dictating how we live and how we are treated by others, but this doesn't mean they have the same significance underneath our skins."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T51","span":{"begin":0,"end":273},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T52","span":{"begin":274,"end":431},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T53","span":{"begin":432,"end":615},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T54","span":{"begin":616,"end":699},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T55","span":{"begin":700,"end":726},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T56","span":{"begin":727,"end":915},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"One possible reason that race keeps being reintroduced into health research is that one of its blue-sky goals is to have personalised medicine so precise that every person's biological profile is perfectly understood, avoiding adverse drug reactions and unnecessary deaths. In the greyer real world in which we don't have all the necessary data to do this, some doctors and researchers instead turn to social categories as proxies. They work on the assumption that certain groups share certain health traits on average, allowing them to roughly gauge the medical requirements of any patient belonging to that group. It feels like a useful step on the road to personalised medicine, some might argue. In my view, it is a fudge. Our social categories have enormous power in society, in dictating how we live and how we are treated by others, but this doesn't mean they have the same significance underneath our skins."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T9","span":{"begin":227,"end":249},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A9","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T9","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0020172"}],"text":"One possible reason that race keeps being reintroduced into health research is that one of its blue-sky goals is to have personalised medicine so precise that every person's biological profile is perfectly understood, avoiding adverse drug reactions and unnecessary deaths. In the greyer real world in which we don't have all the necessary data to do this, some doctors and researchers instead turn to social categories as proxies. They work on the assumption that certain groups share certain health traits on average, allowing them to roughly gauge the medical requirements of any patient belonging to that group. It feels like a useful step on the road to personalised medicine, some might argue. In my view, it is a fudge. Our social categories have enormous power in society, in dictating how we live and how we are treated by others, but this doesn't mean they have the same significance underneath our skins."}