PMC:7228307 / 49918-50185 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"1009","span":{"begin":167,"end":171},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"1010","span":{"begin":58,"end":62},"obj":"Gene"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1009","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"1009","obj":"Gene:2213"},{"id":"A1010","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"1010","obj":"Gene:2213"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"One approach to minimize interactions with the activating FcγR has been the use of IgG4 or IgG2 backbones, which show a more restricted specificity for the activating FcγR and consequently have been traditionally, and simplistically, viewed as “inert” IgG subclasses."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T396","span":{"begin":96,"end":105},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T397","span":{"begin":252,"end":255},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A396","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T396","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma13478"},{"id":"A397","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T397","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma62872"}],"text":"One approach to minimize interactions with the activating FcγR has been the use of IgG4 or IgG2 backbones, which show a more restricted specificity for the activating FcγR and consequently have been traditionally, and simplistically, viewed as “inert” IgG subclasses."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T851","span":{"begin":47,"end":57},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001658"},{"id":"T852","span":{"begin":58,"end":60},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0052676"},{"id":"T853","span":{"begin":63,"end":66},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582"},{"id":"T854","span":{"begin":118,"end":119},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T855","span":{"begin":156,"end":166},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001658"},{"id":"T856","span":{"begin":167,"end":169},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0052676"}],"text":"One approach to minimize interactions with the activating FcγR has been the use of IgG4 or IgG2 backbones, which show a more restricted specificity for the activating FcγR and consequently have been traditionally, and simplistically, viewed as “inert” IgG subclasses."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-Pubtator","denotations":[{"id":"1009","span":{"begin":167,"end":171},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"1010","span":{"begin":58,"end":62},"obj":"Gene"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1009","pred":"pubann:denotes","subj":"1009","obj":"Gene:2213"},{"id":"A1010","pred":"pubann:denotes","subj":"1010","obj":"Gene:2213"}],"text":"One approach to minimize interactions with the activating FcγR has been the use of IgG4 or IgG2 backbones, which show a more restricted specificity for the activating FcγR and consequently have been traditionally, and simplistically, viewed as “inert” IgG subclasses."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T287","span":{"begin":0,"end":267},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"One approach to minimize interactions with the activating FcγR has been the use of IgG4 or IgG2 backbones, which show a more restricted specificity for the activating FcγR and consequently have been traditionally, and simplistically, viewed as “inert” IgG subclasses."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-PD-FMA","denotations":[{"id":"T395","span":{"begin":96,"end":105},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T396","span":{"begin":252,"end":255},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A395","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T395","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma13478"},{"id":"A396","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T396","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma62872"}],"text":"One approach to minimize interactions with the activating FcγR has been the use of IgG4 or IgG2 backbones, which show a more restricted specificity for the activating FcγR and consequently have been traditionally, and simplistically, viewed as “inert” IgG subclasses."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T287","span":{"begin":0,"end":267},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"One approach to minimize interactions with the activating FcγR has been the use of IgG4 or IgG2 backbones, which show a more restricted specificity for the activating FcγR and consequently have been traditionally, and simplistically, viewed as “inert” IgG subclasses."}