PMC:7228307 / 23758-24051 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"421","span":{"begin":72,"end":77},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A421","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"421","obj":"MESH:D005483"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T245","span":{"begin":93,"end":106},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T246","span":{"begin":93,"end":97},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A245","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T245","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma63841"},{"id":"A246","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T246","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma68646"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T36","span":{"begin":13,"end":17},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T37","span":{"begin":128,"end":132},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T38","span":{"begin":277,"end":281},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T39","span":{"begin":286,"end":290},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A36","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T36","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0022697"},{"id":"A37","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T37","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0022697"},{"id":"A38","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T38","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0008734"},{"id":"A39","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T39","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0022697"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T460","span":{"begin":93,"end":97},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0005623"},{"id":"T461","span":{"begin":98,"end":106},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000158"},{"id":"T462","span":{"begin":133,"end":141},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001658"},{"id":"T463","span":{"begin":201,"end":209},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000158"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T123","span":{"begin":164,"end":171},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T124","span":{"begin":243,"end":250},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A123","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T123","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_53000"},{"id":"A124","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T124","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_53000"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-PD-IDO","denotations":[{"id":"T140","span":{"begin":93,"end":97},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000000"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-Pubtator","denotations":[{"id":"421","span":{"begin":72,"end":77},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A421","pred":"pubann:denotes","subj":"421","obj":"MESH:D005483"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T138","span":{"begin":0,"end":293},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-PD-FMA","denotations":[{"id":"T244","span":{"begin":93,"end":106},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T245","span":{"begin":93,"end":97},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A244","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T244","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma63841"},{"id":"A245","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T245","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma68646"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-PD-GO-BP-0","denotations":[{"id":"T62","span":{"begin":277,"end":281},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001788"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sample-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T62","span":{"begin":277,"end":281},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001788"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T62","span":{"begin":277,"end":281},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001788"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T138","span":{"begin":0,"end":293},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"By contrast, ADCP was poor  when targeting epitopes displayed close or \"flush\" to the target cell membrane (within ~0.3 nm) but ADCP activity was restored when the epitope was displayed 1.5 nm off the membrane, demonstrating different optimal epitope distance requirements for ADCC and ADCP.42"}