PMC:7214329 / 978-1583 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"21","span":{"begin":564,"end":570},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"22","span":{"begin":496,"end":501},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"23","span":{"begin":528,"end":536},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A21","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"21","obj":"Tax:10090"},{"id":"A22","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"22","obj":"MESH:D014867"},{"id":"A23","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"23","obj":"MESH:D006973"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Results\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":14,"end":17},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A4","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T4","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma67095"}],"text":"Results\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":194,"end":195},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":440,"end":441},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":564,"end":570},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0007836"}],"text":"Results\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":496,"end":501},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T1","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_15377"}],"text":"Results\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T13","span":{"begin":0,"end":7},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T14","span":{"begin":8,"end":57},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T15","span":{"begin":58,"end":229},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T16","span":{"begin":230,"end":409},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T17","span":{"begin":410,"end":605},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Results\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%)."}