PMC:7214329 / 363-1919 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"12","span":{"begin":216,"end":226},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"13","span":{"begin":350,"end":360},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"14","span":{"begin":11,"end":35},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"15","span":{"begin":37,"end":45},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"17","span":{"begin":520,"end":530},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"21","span":{"begin":1179,"end":1185},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"22","span":{"begin":1111,"end":1116},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"23","span":{"begin":1143,"end":1151},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"25","span":{"begin":1296,"end":1304},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A12","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"12","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A13","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"13","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A14","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"14","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A15","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"15","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A17","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"17","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A21","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"21","obj":"Tax:10090"},{"id":"A22","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"22","obj":"MESH:D014867"},{"id":"A23","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"23","obj":"MESH:D006973"},{"id":"A25","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"25","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Background\nCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the extent of environmental contamination and its potential contribution of environmental contamination to SARS-CoV-2 transmission are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether environmental contamination may play a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.\n\nMethods\nAir samples were collected by natural precipitation, and environmental surface samples were collected by conventional surface swabbing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was performed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.\n\nResults\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%).\n\nConclusions\nMost of the touchable surfaces in the designated hospital for COVID-19 were heavily contaminated, suggesting that the environment is a potential medium of disease transmission. These results emphasize the need for strict environmental surface hygiene practices and enhanced hand hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":531,"end":534},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":629,"end":632},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":1508,"end":1512},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A3","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T3","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma67095"},{"id":"A4","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T4","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma67095"},{"id":"A5","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T5","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma9712"}],"text":"Background\nCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the extent of environmental contamination and its potential contribution of environmental contamination to SARS-CoV-2 transmission are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether environmental contamination may play a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.\n\nMethods\nAir samples were collected by natural precipitation, and environmental surface samples were collected by conventional surface swabbing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was performed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.\n\nResults\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%).\n\nConclusions\nMost of the touchable surfaces in the designated hospital for COVID-19 were heavily contaminated, suggesting that the environment is a potential medium of disease transmission. These results emphasize the need for strict environmental surface hygiene practices and enhanced hand hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":1508,"end":1512},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A2","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T2","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002398"}],"text":"Background\nCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the extent of environmental contamination and its potential contribution of environmental contamination to SARS-CoV-2 transmission are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether environmental contamination may play a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.\n\nMethods\nAir samples were collected by natural precipitation, and environmental surface samples were collected by conventional surface swabbing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was performed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.\n\nResults\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%).\n\nConclusions\nMost of the touchable surfaces in the designated hospital for COVID-19 were heavily contaminated, suggesting that the environment is a potential medium of disease transmission. These results emphasize the need for strict environmental surface hygiene practices and enhanced hand hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":11,"end":35},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":37,"end":45},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T7","span":{"begin":216,"end":224},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":350,"end":358},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T9","span":{"begin":520,"end":528},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T10","span":{"begin":1296,"end":1304},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A5","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T5","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"},{"id":"A6","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T6","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"},{"id":"A7","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T7","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A8","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T8","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A9","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T9","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A10","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T10","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"}],"text":"Background\nCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the extent of environmental contamination and its potential contribution of environmental contamination to SARS-CoV-2 transmission are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether environmental contamination may play a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.\n\nMethods\nAir samples were collected by natural precipitation, and environmental surface samples were collected by conventional surface swabbing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was performed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.\n\nResults\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%).\n\nConclusions\nMost of the touchable surfaces in the designated hospital for COVID-19 were heavily contaminated, suggesting that the environment is a potential medium of disease transmission. These results emphasize the need for strict environmental surface hygiene practices and enhanced hand hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":340,"end":341},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":809,"end":810},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":1055,"end":1056},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":1179,"end":1185},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0007836"},{"id":"T7","span":{"begin":1367,"end":1368},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":1550,"end":1555},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_10239"}],"text":"Background\nCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the extent of environmental contamination and its potential contribution of environmental contamination to SARS-CoV-2 transmission are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether environmental contamination may play a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.\n\nMethods\nAir samples were collected by natural precipitation, and environmental surface samples were collected by conventional surface swabbing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was performed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.\n\nResults\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%).\n\nConclusions\nMost of the touchable surfaces in the designated hospital for COVID-19 were heavily contaminated, suggesting that the environment is a potential medium of disease transmission. These results emphasize the need for strict environmental surface hygiene practices and enhanced hand hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":1111,"end":1116},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T1","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_15377"}],"text":"Background\nCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the extent of environmental contamination and its potential contribution of environmental contamination to SARS-CoV-2 transmission are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether environmental contamination may play a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.\n\nMethods\nAir samples were collected by natural precipitation, and environmental surface samples were collected by conventional surface swabbing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was performed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.\n\nResults\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%).\n\nConclusions\nMost of the touchable surfaces in the designated hospital for COVID-19 were heavily contaminated, suggesting that the environment is a potential medium of disease transmission. These results emphasize the need for strict environmental surface hygiene practices and enhanced hand hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":565,"end":586},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001171"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":573,"end":586},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0006351"}],"text":"Background\nCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the extent of environmental contamination and its potential contribution of environmental contamination to SARS-CoV-2 transmission are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether environmental contamination may play a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.\n\nMethods\nAir samples were collected by natural precipitation, and environmental surface samples were collected by conventional surface swabbing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was performed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.\n\nResults\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%).\n\nConclusions\nMost of the touchable surfaces in the designated hospital for COVID-19 were heavily contaminated, suggesting that the environment is a potential medium of disease transmission. These results emphasize the need for strict environmental surface hygiene practices and enhanced hand hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T7","span":{"begin":0,"end":10},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":11,"end":262},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T9","span":{"begin":263,"end":374},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T10","span":{"begin":376,"end":383},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T11","span":{"begin":384,"end":519},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T12","span":{"begin":520,"end":613},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T13","span":{"begin":615,"end":622},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T14","span":{"begin":623,"end":672},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T15","span":{"begin":673,"end":844},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T16","span":{"begin":845,"end":1024},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T17","span":{"begin":1025,"end":1220},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T18","span":{"begin":1222,"end":1233},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T19","span":{"begin":1234,"end":1410},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T20","span":{"begin":1411,"end":1556},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Background\nCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the extent of environmental contamination and its potential contribution of environmental contamination to SARS-CoV-2 transmission are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether environmental contamination may play a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.\n\nMethods\nAir samples were collected by natural precipitation, and environmental surface samples were collected by conventional surface swabbing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was performed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.\n\nResults\nViral RNA was not detected in the 44 air samples. The positive rates in 200 environmental surface samples in medical areas (24.83%) was higher than that in living quarters (3.64%), with a significant difference (P \u003c .05). The positive rates were 25.00% and 37.50% for the general isolation ward and intensive care unit, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between them (P = .238). The top 5 sampling sites with a positive rate in medical areas were beepers (50.00%), water machine buttons (50.00%), elevator buttons (42.86%), computer mouses (40.00%), and telephones (40.00%).\n\nConclusions\nMost of the touchable surfaces in the designated hospital for COVID-19 were heavily contaminated, suggesting that the environment is a potential medium of disease transmission. These results emphasize the need for strict environmental surface hygiene practices and enhanced hand hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus."}