PMC:7212965 / 27612-27967 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T58","span":{"begin":207,"end":212},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A58","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T58","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma64183"}],"text":"The authors concluded that although this does not confer infectivity, it raised the possibility of fecal–oral transmission.78 The small sample size of the reports that assessed the presence of live virus in stool combined with the conflicting findings limit our certainty in the evidence and thus the question of fecal–oral transmission remains unsettled."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T43","span":{"begin":207,"end":212},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A43","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T43","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001988"}],"text":"The authors concluded that although this does not confer infectivity, it raised the possibility of fecal–oral transmission.78 The small sample size of the reports that assessed the presence of live virus in stool combined with the conflicting findings limit our certainty in the evidence and thus the question of fecal–oral transmission remains unsettled."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T215","span":{"begin":198,"end":203},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_10239"}],"text":"The authors concluded that although this does not confer infectivity, it raised the possibility of fecal–oral transmission.78 The small sample size of the reports that assessed the presence of live virus in stool combined with the conflicting findings limit our certainty in the evidence and thus the question of fecal–oral transmission remains unsettled."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T182","span":{"begin":0,"end":355},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"The authors concluded that although this does not confer infectivity, it raised the possibility of fecal–oral transmission.78 The small sample size of the reports that assessed the presence of live virus in stool combined with the conflicting findings limit our certainty in the evidence and thus the question of fecal–oral transmission remains unsettled."}