PMC:7187660 / 691-1057 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":219,"end":227},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A6","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T6","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"}],"text":"n, 1023 (2.3%) patients were dead as of February 11, 2020, the last day of follow-up. The fatality rate was increasing with ages and even up to 14.8% in patients aged above 80 years old (see Fig. 1a). The prevalence of COVID-19 between men and women was pretty close (51.4% vs. 48.6%), which is different from previous report (58.1% vs. 41.9%) [3]. Notably, the fata"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":49,"end":51},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0053733"}],"text":"n, 1023 (2.3%) patients were dead as of February 11, 2020, the last day of follow-up. The fatality rate was increasing with ages and even up to 14.8% in patients aged above 80 years old (see Fig. 1a). The prevalence of COVID-19 between men and women was pretty close (51.4% vs. 48.6%), which is different from previous report (58.1% vs. 41.9%) [3]. Notably, the fata"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":86,"end":200},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T7","span":{"begin":201,"end":348},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"n, 1023 (2.3%) patients were dead as of February 11, 2020, the last day of follow-up. The fatality rate was increasing with ages and even up to 14.8% in patients aged above 80 years old (see Fig. 1a). The prevalence of COVID-19 between men and women was pretty close (51.4% vs. 48.6%), which is different from previous report (58.1% vs. 41.9%) [3]. Notably, the fata"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PMC-OGER-BB","denotations":[{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":219,"end":227},"obj":"SP_7"},{"id":"T56005","span":{"begin":219,"end":227},"obj":"SP_7"}],"text":"n, 1023 (2.3%) patients were dead as of February 11, 2020, the last day of follow-up. The fatality rate was increasing with ages and even up to 14.8% in patients aged above 80 years old (see Fig. 1a). The prevalence of COVID-19 between men and women was pretty close (51.4% vs. 48.6%), which is different from previous report (58.1% vs. 41.9%) [3]. Notably, the fata"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"42","span":{"begin":15,"end":23},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"43","span":{"begin":153,"end":161},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"44","span":{"begin":236,"end":239},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"45","span":{"begin":244,"end":249},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"51","span":{"begin":219,"end":227},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A42","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"42","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A43","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"43","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A44","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"44","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A45","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"45","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A51","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"51","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"n, 1023 (2.3%) patients were dead as of February 11, 2020, the last day of follow-up. The fatality rate was increasing with ages and even up to 14.8% in patients aged above 80 years old (see Fig. 1a). The prevalence of COVID-19 between men and women was pretty close (51.4% vs. 48.6%), which is different from previous report (58.1% vs. 41.9%) [3]. Notably, the fata"}