PMC:7116472 / 23241-24288 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"331","span":{"begin":364,"end":373},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"335","span":{"begin":682,"end":685},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"336","span":{"begin":790,"end":795},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"337","span":{"begin":596,"end":605},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A331","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"331","obj":"MESH:D003643"},{"id":"A335","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"335","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A336","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"336","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A337","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"337","obj":"MESH:D003643"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Sensitivity analysis\nSensitivity analyses that used complete case data showed similar discrimination (appendix 7) and performance metrics (appendices 8 and 9) to analyses that used the imputed dataset. After stratification of the validation cohort into two geographical cohorts (validation north and south; appendix 14), discrimination remained similar for the 4C Mortality Score in the north subset (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.78) and south subset (0.76, 0.75 to 0.77; appendix 6).\nFinally, we checked discrimination of the 4C Mortality Score by sex and ethnic group (appendix 10). Discrimination was the same in men (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.78) and women (0.76, 0.75 to 0.77). Discrimination was better in all nonwhite ethnic groups compared with the white group: South Asian (0.82, 0.80 to 0.85), East Asian (0.85, 0.79 to 0.91), Black (0.83, 0.80 to 0.86), and other ethnic minority (0.81, 0.79 to 0.84)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T152","span":{"begin":0,"end":20},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T153","span":{"begin":21,"end":201},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T154","span":{"begin":202,"end":550},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T155","span":{"begin":551,"end":650},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T156","span":{"begin":651,"end":817},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T157","span":{"begin":818,"end":904},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T158","span":{"begin":905,"end":1047},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Sensitivity analysis\nSensitivity analyses that used complete case data showed similar discrimination (appendix 7) and performance metrics (appendices 8 and 9) to analyses that used the imputed dataset. After stratification of the validation cohort into two geographical cohorts (validation north and south; appendix 14), discrimination remained similar for the 4C Mortality Score in the north subset (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.78) and south subset (0.76, 0.75 to 0.77; appendix 6).\nFinally, we checked discrimination of the 4C Mortality Score by sex and ethnic group (appendix 10). Discrimination was the same in men (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.78) and women (0.76, 0.75 to 0.77). Discrimination was better in all nonwhite ethnic groups compared with the white group: South Asian (0.82, 0.80 to 0.85), East Asian (0.85, 0.79 to 0.91), Black (0.83, 0.80 to 0.86), and other ethnic minority (0.81, 0.79 to 0.84)."}