PMC:7116472 / 22970-23239 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"329","span":{"begin":43,"end":52},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A329","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"329","obj":"MESH:D003643"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Decision curve analysis showed that the 4C Mortality Score had better clinical utility across a wide range of threshold risks compared with the best performing existing scores applicable to more than 50% of the validation cohort (A-DROP and CURB65; fig 3, lower panel)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T151","span":{"begin":0,"end":269},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Decision curve analysis showed that the 4C Mortality Score had better clinical utility across a wide range of threshold risks compared with the best performing existing scores applicable to more than 50% of the validation cohort (A-DROP and CURB65; fig 3, lower panel)."}