PMC:7095246 / 17242-17596
Annnotations
LitCovid-PD-MONDO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T76","span":{"begin":7,"end":10},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T77","span":{"begin":42,"end":50},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T78","span":{"begin":108,"end":111},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T79","span":{"begin":219,"end":222},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T80","span":{"begin":294,"end":297},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A76","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T76","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0001881"},{"id":"A77","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T77","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"},{"id":"A78","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T78","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0001881"},{"id":"A79","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T79","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0001881"},{"id":"A80","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T80","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0001881"}],"text":"Fig. 4 TSS for diagnosing severe-critical COVID-19. Using ROC to test the differential diagnosis ability of TSS in common-type group and severe-critical-type group. ROC analysis showed the area under the curve (AUC) of TSS for diagnosing severe-critical type was 0.918 (95%CI 0.843–0.994). The TSS cutoff of 7.5 had 82.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity"}
LitCovid-PD-CLO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T135","span":{"begin":65,"end":69},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"}],"text":"Fig. 4 TSS for diagnosing severe-critical COVID-19. Using ROC to test the differential diagnosis ability of TSS in common-type group and severe-critical-type group. ROC analysis showed the area under the curve (AUC) of TSS for diagnosing severe-critical type was 0.918 (95%CI 0.843–0.994). The TSS cutoff of 7.5 had 82.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity"}
LitCovid-PD-CHEBI
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T12","span":{"begin":127,"end":132},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T13","span":{"begin":158,"end":163},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A12","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T12","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24433"},{"id":"A13","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T13","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24433"}],"text":"Fig. 4 TSS for diagnosing severe-critical COVID-19. Using ROC to test the differential diagnosis ability of TSS in common-type group and severe-critical-type group. ROC analysis showed the area under the curve (AUC) of TSS for diagnosing severe-critical type was 0.918 (95%CI 0.843–0.994). The TSS cutoff of 7.5 had 82.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity"}
LitCovid-sentences
{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T202","span":{"begin":0,"end":51},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T203","span":{"begin":52,"end":164},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T204","span":{"begin":165,"end":289},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T205","span":{"begin":290,"end":354},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Fig. 4 TSS for diagnosing severe-critical COVID-19. Using ROC to test the differential diagnosis ability of TSS in common-type group and severe-critical-type group. ROC analysis showed the area under the curve (AUC) of TSS for diagnosing severe-critical type was 0.918 (95%CI 0.843–0.994). The TSS cutoff of 7.5 had 82.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity"}
LitCovid-PubTator
{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"223","span":{"begin":42,"end":50},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A223","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"223","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Fig. 4 TSS for diagnosing severe-critical COVID-19. Using ROC to test the differential diagnosis ability of TSS in common-type group and severe-critical-type group. ROC analysis showed the area under the curve (AUC) of TSS for diagnosing severe-critical type was 0.918 (95%CI 0.843–0.994). The TSS cutoff of 7.5 had 82.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity"}