PMC:7068163 / 8942-9413
Annnotations
LitCovid-PubTator
{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"138","span":{"begin":347,"end":348},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"139","span":{"begin":263,"end":273},"obj":"Species"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A138","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"138","obj":"Gene:43740570"},{"id":"A139","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"139","obj":"Tax:2697049"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"In the following, we decided to switch to the SuperScript III system as recommended by Corman et al. [5], also because of its decreased thermoprofile run-time (Table). Moreover, we additionally included a newly launched commercial test kit in our study: RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit 1.0 (Altona, Hamburg, Germany), which did not show unspecific E gene signals. A summary of the assay features of the three PCR setups tested and compared in detail is shown in the Table."}
LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T34","span":{"begin":349,"end":353},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A34","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T34","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma74402"}],"text":"In the following, we decided to switch to the SuperScript III system as recommended by Corman et al. [5], also because of its decreased thermoprofile run-time (Table). Moreover, we additionally included a newly launched commercial test kit in our study: RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit 1.0 (Altona, Hamburg, Germany), which did not show unspecific E gene signals. A summary of the assay features of the three PCR setups tested and compared in detail is shown in the Table."}
LitCovid_AGAC
{"project":"LitCovid_AGAC","denotations":[{"id":"p13283s8","span":{"begin":126,"end":135},"obj":"NegReg"}],"text":"In the following, we decided to switch to the SuperScript III system as recommended by Corman et al. [5], also because of its decreased thermoprofile run-time (Table). Moreover, we additionally included a newly launched commercial test kit in our study: RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit 1.0 (Altona, Hamburg, Germany), which did not show unspecific E gene signals. A summary of the assay features of the three PCR setups tested and compared in detail is shown in the Table."}
LitCovid-PD-MONDO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T34","span":{"begin":263,"end":271},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A34","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T34","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"}],"text":"In the following, we decided to switch to the SuperScript III system as recommended by Corman et al. [5], also because of its decreased thermoprofile run-time (Table). Moreover, we additionally included a newly launched commercial test kit in our study: RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit 1.0 (Altona, Hamburg, Germany), which did not show unspecific E gene signals. A summary of the assay features of the three PCR setups tested and compared in detail is shown in the Table."}
LitCovid-PD-CLO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T89","span":{"begin":203,"end":204},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T90","span":{"begin":231,"end":235},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T91","span":{"begin":349,"end":353},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OGG_0000000002"},{"id":"T92","span":{"begin":354,"end":361},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/SO_0000418"},{"id":"T93","span":{"begin":363,"end":364},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T94","span":{"begin":419,"end":425},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"}],"text":"In the following, we decided to switch to the SuperScript III system as recommended by Corman et al. [5], also because of its decreased thermoprofile run-time (Table). Moreover, we additionally included a newly launched commercial test kit in our study: RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit 1.0 (Altona, Hamburg, Germany), which did not show unspecific E gene signals. A summary of the assay features of the three PCR setups tested and compared in detail is shown in the Table."}
LitCovid-sentences
{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T71","span":{"begin":0,"end":167},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T72","span":{"begin":168,"end":253},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T73","span":{"begin":254,"end":362},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T74","span":{"begin":363,"end":471},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"In the following, we decided to switch to the SuperScript III system as recommended by Corman et al. [5], also because of its decreased thermoprofile run-time (Table). Moreover, we additionally included a newly launched commercial test kit in our study: RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit 1.0 (Altona, Hamburg, Germany), which did not show unspecific E gene signals. A summary of the assay features of the three PCR setups tested and compared in detail is shown in the Table."}
2_test
{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32156330-31992387-29325823","span":{"begin":102,"end":103},"obj":"31992387"}],"text":"In the following, we decided to switch to the SuperScript III system as recommended by Corman et al. [5], also because of its decreased thermoprofile run-time (Table). Moreover, we additionally included a newly launched commercial test kit in our study: RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit 1.0 (Altona, Hamburg, Germany), which did not show unspecific E gene signals. A summary of the assay features of the three PCR setups tested and compared in detail is shown in the Table."}
MyTest
{"project":"MyTest","denotations":[{"id":"32156330-31992387-29325823","span":{"begin":102,"end":103},"obj":"31992387"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/testbase"},{"prefix":"UniProtKB","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/"},{"prefix":"uniprot","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/"}],"text":"In the following, we decided to switch to the SuperScript III system as recommended by Corman et al. [5], also because of its decreased thermoprofile run-time (Table). Moreover, we additionally included a newly launched commercial test kit in our study: RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit 1.0 (Altona, Hamburg, Germany), which did not show unspecific E gene signals. A summary of the assay features of the three PCR setups tested and compared in detail is shown in the Table."}