PMC:7062829 / 22669-24062
Annnotations
LitCovid-PubTator
{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"246","span":{"begin":674,"end":684},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"247","span":{"begin":812,"end":821},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"248","span":{"begin":994,"end":998},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"249","span":{"begin":999,"end":1008},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A246","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"246","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A247","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"247","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A248","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"248","obj":"MESH:D018352"},{"id":"A249","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"249","obj":"MESH:D007239"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Egocentric personal contract network\nTo understand the modular structures of this disease contact matrix, egocentric personal contact networks were examined. The ego networks of personal contacts consist of both a focal infectious host (ego) and a set of susceptible hosts (alters), which received infectious contacts from the ego, and a measurement of contact relations among these alters. The results showed that host #14 was the infectious individual host having the largest egocentric network, and 74 individual hosts had established infectious contacts (Table 3). Among the 74 susceptible hosts in the network of host #14, four were direct person-to-person transmitted infections out of 5,402 possible infectious contact relations, which confirmed the presence of 0.07% of all possible contact relations of infection transmission between hosts. The results of other infectious hosts also show the very fragmented nature of egocentric contact network relationships. Thus, the spread of the MERS infection by hub infectious hosts was more likely in a small-world network, where the individual hosts were not tightly connected in local structures (see Supplementary Fig. 4).\nTable 3 Egocentric structural metrics for the top-5 highest degree infectious hosts.\nRank Hosts Size Ties Pairs Density\n1 M14 74 4 5402 0.07\n2 M1 31 5 930 0.54\n3 M16 23 1 506 0.20\n4 M76 10 0 90 0.00\n5 M15 6 0 30 0.00"}
LitCovid-PD-MONDO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T71","span":{"begin":220,"end":230},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T72","span":{"begin":298,"end":308},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T73","span":{"begin":432,"end":442},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T74","span":{"begin":538,"end":548},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T75","span":{"begin":674,"end":684},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T76","span":{"begin":707,"end":717},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T77","span":{"begin":812,"end":821},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T78","span":{"begin":871,"end":881},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T79","span":{"begin":999,"end":1008},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T80","span":{"begin":1016,"end":1026},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T81","span":{"begin":1244,"end":1254},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A71","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T71","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A72","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T72","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A73","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T73","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A74","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T74","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A75","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T75","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A76","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T76","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A77","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T77","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A78","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T78","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A79","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T79","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A80","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T80","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A81","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T81","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"}],"text":"Egocentric personal contract network\nTo understand the modular structures of this disease contact matrix, egocentric personal contact networks were examined. The ego networks of personal contacts consist of both a focal infectious host (ego) and a set of susceptible hosts (alters), which received infectious contacts from the ego, and a measurement of contact relations among these alters. The results showed that host #14 was the infectious individual host having the largest egocentric network, and 74 individual hosts had established infectious contacts (Table 3). Among the 74 susceptible hosts in the network of host #14, four were direct person-to-person transmitted infections out of 5,402 possible infectious contact relations, which confirmed the presence of 0.07% of all possible contact relations of infection transmission between hosts. The results of other infectious hosts also show the very fragmented nature of egocentric contact network relationships. Thus, the spread of the MERS infection by hub infectious hosts was more likely in a small-world network, where the individual hosts were not tightly connected in local structures (see Supplementary Fig. 4).\nTable 3 Egocentric structural metrics for the top-5 highest degree infectious hosts.\nRank Hosts Size Ties Pairs Density\n1 M14 74 4 5402 0.07\n2 M1 31 5 930 0.54\n3 M16 23 1 506 0.20\n4 M76 10 0 90 0.00\n5 M15 6 0 30 0.00"}
LitCovid-PD-CLO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T119","span":{"begin":212,"end":213},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T120","span":{"begin":246,"end":247},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T121","span":{"begin":336,"end":337},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T122","span":{"begin":1052,"end":1053},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T123","span":{"begin":1299,"end":1302},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0007450"},{"id":"T124","span":{"begin":1320,"end":1322},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0007448"},{"id":"T125","span":{"begin":1320,"end":1322},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050175"},{"id":"T126","span":{"begin":1348,"end":1351},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001404"},{"id":"T127","span":{"begin":1378,"end":1381},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0007461"}],"text":"Egocentric personal contract network\nTo understand the modular structures of this disease contact matrix, egocentric personal contact networks were examined. The ego networks of personal contacts consist of both a focal infectious host (ego) and a set of susceptible hosts (alters), which received infectious contacts from the ego, and a measurement of contact relations among these alters. The results showed that host #14 was the infectious individual host having the largest egocentric network, and 74 individual hosts had established infectious contacts (Table 3). Among the 74 susceptible hosts in the network of host #14, four were direct person-to-person transmitted infections out of 5,402 possible infectious contact relations, which confirmed the presence of 0.07% of all possible contact relations of infection transmission between hosts. The results of other infectious hosts also show the very fragmented nature of egocentric contact network relationships. Thus, the spread of the MERS infection by hub infectious hosts was more likely in a small-world network, where the individual hosts were not tightly connected in local structures (see Supplementary Fig. 4).\nTable 3 Egocentric structural metrics for the top-5 highest degree infectious hosts.\nRank Hosts Size Ties Pairs Density\n1 M14 74 4 5402 0.07\n2 M1 31 5 930 0.54\n3 M16 23 1 506 0.20\n4 M76 10 0 90 0.00\n5 M15 6 0 30 0.00"}
LitCovid-PD-CHEBI
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T27","span":{"begin":1320,"end":1322},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T31","span":{"begin":1339,"end":1342},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A27","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T27","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_51079"},{"id":"A28","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T27","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_139019"},{"id":"A29","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T27","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_140152"},{"id":"A30","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T27","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_34826"},{"id":"A31","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T31","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_140163"}],"text":"Egocentric personal contract network\nTo understand the modular structures of this disease contact matrix, egocentric personal contact networks were examined. The ego networks of personal contacts consist of both a focal infectious host (ego) and a set of susceptible hosts (alters), which received infectious contacts from the ego, and a measurement of contact relations among these alters. The results showed that host #14 was the infectious individual host having the largest egocentric network, and 74 individual hosts had established infectious contacts (Table 3). Among the 74 susceptible hosts in the network of host #14, four were direct person-to-person transmitted infections out of 5,402 possible infectious contact relations, which confirmed the presence of 0.07% of all possible contact relations of infection transmission between hosts. The results of other infectious hosts also show the very fragmented nature of egocentric contact network relationships. Thus, the spread of the MERS infection by hub infectious hosts was more likely in a small-world network, where the individual hosts were not tightly connected in local structures (see Supplementary Fig. 4).\nTable 3 Egocentric structural metrics for the top-5 highest degree infectious hosts.\nRank Hosts Size Ties Pairs Density\n1 M14 74 4 5402 0.07\n2 M1 31 5 930 0.54\n3 M16 23 1 506 0.20\n4 M76 10 0 90 0.00\n5 M15 6 0 30 0.00"}
LitCovid-sentences
{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T167","span":{"begin":0,"end":36},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T168","span":{"begin":37,"end":157},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T169","span":{"begin":158,"end":390},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T170","span":{"begin":391,"end":568},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T171","span":{"begin":569,"end":849},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T172","span":{"begin":850,"end":969},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T173","span":{"begin":970,"end":1176},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T174","span":{"begin":1177,"end":1261},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T175","span":{"begin":1262,"end":1296},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T176","span":{"begin":1297,"end":1317},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T177","span":{"begin":1318,"end":1336},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T178","span":{"begin":1337,"end":1356},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T179","span":{"begin":1357,"end":1375},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T180","span":{"begin":1376,"end":1393},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Egocentric personal contract network\nTo understand the modular structures of this disease contact matrix, egocentric personal contact networks were examined. The ego networks of personal contacts consist of both a focal infectious host (ego) and a set of susceptible hosts (alters), which received infectious contacts from the ego, and a measurement of contact relations among these alters. The results showed that host #14 was the infectious individual host having the largest egocentric network, and 74 individual hosts had established infectious contacts (Table 3). Among the 74 susceptible hosts in the network of host #14, four were direct person-to-person transmitted infections out of 5,402 possible infectious contact relations, which confirmed the presence of 0.07% of all possible contact relations of infection transmission between hosts. The results of other infectious hosts also show the very fragmented nature of egocentric contact network relationships. Thus, the spread of the MERS infection by hub infectious hosts was more likely in a small-world network, where the individual hosts were not tightly connected in local structures (see Supplementary Fig. 4).\nTable 3 Egocentric structural metrics for the top-5 highest degree infectious hosts.\nRank Hosts Size Ties Pairs Density\n1 M14 74 4 5402 0.07\n2 M1 31 5 930 0.54\n3 M16 23 1 506 0.20\n4 M76 10 0 90 0.00\n5 M15 6 0 30 0.00"}