| Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
| T120 |
0-49 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Overall network relationship of personal contacts |
| T121 |
50-196 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In network analysis, the nodes are individual hosts, and the links between individuals represent interactions that may allow disease transmission. |
| T122 |
197-360 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The descriptive statistics demonstrate that the average degree of infectious hosts was 1.117, which was quite low, given that there were 161 other hosts (Table 2). |
| T123 |
361-601 |
Sentence |
denotes |
We see that the range of out-degree was significantly larger than that of the in-degree (minimum and maximum), and that there was more variability across the hosts in the out-degree than in the in-degree (standard deviations and variances). |
| T124 |
602-691 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The coefficient variations for out-degree and in-degree were 5.87 and 0.47, respectively. |
| T125 |
692-824 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Thus, the population was more heterogeneous in structural contact positions with regard to out-degree than with regard to in-degree. |
| T126 |
825-962 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The overall centralization of out-degree was high at 46%, and the in-degree centralization was low at 2.4% of these theoretical maximums. |
| T127 |
963-1115 |
Sentence |
denotes |
We arrived at the conclusion that the network of disease transmission might have been dominated more by key hosts than by various groups of individuals. |
| T128 |
1116-1233 |
Sentence |
denotes |
That is, the heterogeneity of the number of contacts tended to affect the spread and persistence of infection6,25,35. |
| T129 |
1234-1322 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Table 2 Centrality measure scores and descriptive statistics for the top-5 ranked hosts. |
| T130 |
1323-1422 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Rank Degree Centrality Betweenness Centrality Closeness Centrality Eigenvector of geodesic distance |
| T131 |
1423-1494 |
Sentence |
denotes |
OutDeg Value InDeg Value Bet Value OutFar Value InFar Value Eigen Value |
| T132 |
1495-1566 |
Sentence |
denotes |
1 M14 74(45.96) M37 5(3.11) M14 91.75(0.356) M1 314 M162 25119 M14 0.69 |
| T133 |
1567-1641 |
Sentence |
denotes |
2 M1 31(19.26) M39 M162 4(2.48) M16 25(0.097) M14 10968 M37 25277 M1 0.161 |
| T134 |
1642-1714 |
Sentence |
denotes |
3 M16 23(14.29) M179 3(1.86) M76 20(0.078) M16 22059 M39 25278 M37 0.111 |
| T135 |
1715-1816 |
Sentence |
denotes |
4 M76 10(6.21) M10 M40, M46 M65 M67 M74 M107 M164 2(1.24) M15 6(0.023) M76 24472 M179 25280 M39 0.093 |
| T136 |
1817-1877 |
Sentence |
denotes |
5 M15 6(3.73) M135 4.5(0.017) M15 25116 M164 25441 M76 0.089 |
| T137 |
1878-1924 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Mean 1.117 1.117 1.086 25751.15 25751.15 0.048 |
| T138 |
1925-1929 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Std. |
| T139 |
1930-1934 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Dev. |
| T140 |
1935-1975 |
Sentence |
denotes |
6.556 0.526 7.604 2351.923 129.203 0.062 |
| T141 |
1976-2021 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Variance 42.98 0.276 57.818 5531541.5 16693.4 |
| T142 |
2022-2045 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Minimum 0 0 0 314 25119 |
| T143 |
2046-2076 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Maximum 74 5 91.75 26082 26082 |
| T144 |
2077-2132 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Network centralization 45.55% 2.43% 0.35% 47.20% 99.18% |
