> top > docs > PMC:7060038 > spans > 30515-33944 > annotations

PMC:7060038 / 30515-33944 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

LitCovid-PubTator

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue tao:has_database_id
222 674-682 Disease denotes infected MESH:D007239
223 1328-1336 Disease denotes infected MESH:D007239
225 2415-2419 Gene denotes PRCC
227 1911-1919 Disease denotes infected MESH:D007239
229 2906-2914 Disease denotes infected MESH:D007239

LitCovid-PD-CLO

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T103 39-40 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T104 1158-1159 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T105 1212-1213 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T106 1305-1306 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T107 1998-1999 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T108 2345-2346 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T109 2686-2689 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582 denotes has
T110 2703-2704 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T111 2863-2864 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T112 2882-2883 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T113 3268-3269 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a

2_test

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
32091395-18572196-27032137 170-174 18572196 denotes 2008

LitCovid-sentences

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T189 0-20 Sentence denotes Sensitivity analysis
T190 21-362 Sentence denotes In the context of a growing epidemic, sensitivity analysis using the method of Latin hypercube sampling and partial rank correlation (Marino et al., 2008) showed that the fraction of travellers detected was moderately sensitive to all parameters considered -- most coefficient estimates fell between 0.1 and 0.3 in absolute value (Figure 4).
T191 363-491 Sentence denotes Sensitivity to R0 was somewhat higher than sensitivity to other parameters, but the difference was not statistically remarkable.
T192 492-589 Sentence denotes R0 and the mean incubation period were negatively associated with the fraction of cases detected.
T193 590-843 Sentence denotes An increase in either of these parameters implies an increase in the probability an infected traveller will be undetectable, either because they have been recently exposed (R0), or have not yet progressed to the symptomatic stage (mean incubation time).
T194 844-1051 Sentence denotes The positive association between the fraction of cases detected and the sensitivity of thermal scanners, sensitivity of risk questionnaires, or the fraction of travellers aware of exposure risk is intuitive.
T195 1052-1205 Sentence denotes Finally, the duration from onset to isolation effectively describes the window of time in which we assume a symptomatic individual could initiate travel.
T196 1206-1368 Sentence denotes Here, a wider window is associated with increased screening effectiveness, because it will lead to a higher proportion of infected travellers who are symptomatic.
T197 1369-1461 Sentence denotes Figure 4 shows results from the middle case scenario, in which 25% of cases are subclinical.
T198 1462-1763 Sentence denotes Considering scenarios where more or fewer cases are subclinical, we see increased influence of the factors based on exposure risk (questionnaire sensitivity and the fraction of cases aware of their exposure) as the proportion of cases with detectable symptoms declines (Figure 4—figures supplement 1).
T199 1764-1773 Sentence denotes Figure 4.
T200 1775-1940 Sentence denotes Sensitivity analysis showing partial rank correlation coefficient (PRCC) between each parameter and the fraction (per-simulation) of 30 infected travellers detected.
T201 1941-2062 Sentence denotes Outcomes were obtained from 1000 simulations, each using a candidate parameter sets drawn using Latin hypercube sampling.
T202 2063-2196 Sentence denotes Text shows PRCC estimate, and * indicates statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (threshold = 9e-4 for 54 comparisons).
T203 2197-2220 Sentence denotes Figure 4—source data 1.
T204 2222-2282 Sentence denotes Source data for Figure 4, and Figure 4—figures supplement 1.
T205 2283-2383 Sentence denotes Source data for Figure 4—figures supplement 2 can be found as a. csv file in the supplementary code.
T206 2384-2413 Sentence denotes Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
T207 2415-2491 Sentence denotes PRCC analysis comparing cases where 5%, 25% or 50% of cases are subclinical.
T208 2492-2569 Sentence denotes (Middle panel is identical to Figure 4, but repeated for ease of comparison).
T209 2570-2599 Sentence denotes Figure 4—figure supplement 2.
T210 2601-2665 Sentence denotes PRCC analysis assuming the source epidemic is no longer growing.
T211 2666-2719 Sentence denotes By construction, R0 has no impact in a flat epidemic.
T212 2720-2844 Sentence denotes Small PRCC estimates for R0 arise from stochasticity in simulated outcomes, but are never significantly different from zero.
T213 2845-3158 Sentence denotes In the context of a stable epidemic, a greater proportion of infected travellers will have progressed to show detectable symptoms, and so screening effectiveness was more sensitive to parameters that impact symptom screening efficacy (thermal scanner sensitivity, and to the time from symptom onset to isolation).
T214 3159-3429 Sentence denotes Note that by construction, model outcomes are insensitive to parameter R0 in the stable epidemic context. As a result, R0 coefficient estimates are very small (non-zero due to stochasticity in simulation outcomes), and never significant. (Figure 4—figures supplement 2).

MyTest

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
32091395-18572196-27032137 170-174 18572196 denotes 2008