PMC:7060038 / 28383-29196 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"213","span":{"begin":449,"end":457},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"214","span":{"begin":564,"end":572},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"215","span":{"begin":772,"end":781},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A213","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"213","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A214","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"214","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A215","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"215","obj":"MESH:D007239"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"In an epidemic that is no longer growing (Figure 3—figures supplement 1), screening effectiveness is considerably higher, as a lower proportion of travellers will be recently exposed. This is shown by the smaller, red ‘undetectable’ region in Figure 3—figures supplement 1B. In a stable epidemic, under the middle-case assumption that 25% of cases are subclinical, we estimate that arrival screening alone would detect roughly one third (17–53%) of infected travelers, and that a combination of arrival and departure screening would detect nearly half (23–63%) of infected travellers. In short, holding all other things equal, screening effectiveness will increase as the source epidemic transitions from growing to stable, owing simply to changes in the distribution of ‘infection ages,’ or times since exposure."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T30","span":{"begin":772,"end":781},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A30","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T30","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"}],"text":"In an epidemic that is no longer growing (Figure 3—figures supplement 1), screening effectiveness is considerably higher, as a lower proportion of travellers will be recently exposed. This is shown by the smaller, red ‘undetectable’ region in Figure 3—figures supplement 1B. In a stable epidemic, under the middle-case assumption that 25% of cases are subclinical, we estimate that arrival screening alone would detect roughly one third (17–53%) of infected travelers, and that a combination of arrival and departure screening would detect nearly half (23–63%) of infected travellers. In short, holding all other things equal, screening effectiveness will increase as the source epidemic transitions from growing to stable, owing simply to changes in the distribution of ‘infection ages,’ or times since exposure."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T97","span":{"begin":125,"end":126},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T98","span":{"begin":278,"end":279},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T99","span":{"begin":478,"end":479},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"}],"text":"In an epidemic that is no longer growing (Figure 3—figures supplement 1), screening effectiveness is considerably higher, as a lower proportion of travellers will be recently exposed. This is shown by the smaller, red ‘undetectable’ region in Figure 3—figures supplement 1B. In a stable epidemic, under the middle-case assumption that 25% of cases are subclinical, we estimate that arrival screening alone would detect roughly one third (17–53%) of infected travelers, and that a combination of arrival and departure screening would detect nearly half (23–63%) of infected travellers. In short, holding all other things equal, screening effectiveness will increase as the source epidemic transitions from growing to stable, owing simply to changes in the distribution of ‘infection ages,’ or times since exposure."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T179","span":{"begin":0,"end":183},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T180","span":{"begin":184,"end":274},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T181","span":{"begin":275,"end":584},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T182","span":{"begin":585,"end":813},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"In an epidemic that is no longer growing (Figure 3—figures supplement 1), screening effectiveness is considerably higher, as a lower proportion of travellers will be recently exposed. This is shown by the smaller, red ‘undetectable’ region in Figure 3—figures supplement 1B. In a stable epidemic, under the middle-case assumption that 25% of cases are subclinical, we estimate that arrival screening alone would detect roughly one third (17–53%) of infected travelers, and that a combination of arrival and departure screening would detect nearly half (23–63%) of infected travellers. In short, holding all other things equal, screening effectiveness will increase as the source epidemic transitions from growing to stable, owing simply to changes in the distribution of ‘infection ages,’ or times since exposure."}