PMC:7040011 / 3626-3804 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T19","span":{"begin":14,"end":19},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003101"},{"id":"T20","span":{"begin":14,"end":19},"obj":"http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0000970"},{"id":"T21","span":{"begin":49,"end":56},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003100"},{"id":"T22","span":{"begin":112,"end":114},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0008922"},{"id":"T23","span":{"begin":112,"end":114},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050052"}],"text":"ation rate in males (0.550) was much higher than females (0.310) in the Chinese population (Supplementary Table S2). Taken together, the differences in AFs of ACE2 coding variant"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T17","span":{"begin":112,"end":114},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A17","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T17","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_29387"}],"text":"ation rate in males (0.550) was much higher than females (0.310) in the Chinese population (Supplementary Table S2). Taken together, the differences in AFs of ACE2 coding variant"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"145","span":{"begin":159,"end":163},"obj":"Gene"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A145","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"145","obj":"Gene:59272"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"ation rate in males (0.550) was much higher than females (0.310) in the Chinese population (Supplementary Table S2). Taken together, the differences in AFs of ACE2 coding variant"}