
PMC:7029158 / 16414-16774
Annnotations
LitCovid-PD-CLO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T85","span":{"begin":22,"end":25},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582"},{"id":"T86","span":{"begin":36,"end":37},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T87","span":{"begin":70,"end":72},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001022"},{"id":"T88","span":{"begin":70,"end":72},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0007314"},{"id":"T89","span":{"begin":89,"end":91},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001022"},{"id":"T90","span":{"begin":89,"end":91},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0007314"},{"id":"T91","span":{"begin":120,"end":121},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T92","span":{"begin":286,"end":290},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0008416"},{"id":"T93","span":{"begin":286,"end":290},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050081"}],"text":"For instance, the WHO has estimated a reproduction number of 1.4–2.5, Li and colleagues (Li et al., 2020) have computed a slightly higher value of 2.2 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.9), while in several other mathematical models which have been so far devised and released as pre-prints or undergone peer-review and published, the reproduction number varies from 1.3 to 4.7."}
LitCovid-PD-CHEBI
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T31","span":{"begin":70,"end":72},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T32","span":{"begin":89,"end":91},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A31","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T31","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_30145"},{"id":"A32","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T32","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_30145"}],"text":"For instance, the WHO has estimated a reproduction number of 1.4–2.5, Li and colleagues (Li et al., 2020) have computed a slightly higher value of 2.2 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.9), while in several other mathematical models which have been so far devised and released as pre-prints or undergone peer-review and published, the reproduction number varies from 1.3 to 4.7."}
LitCovid-PD-GO-BP
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T20","span":{"begin":38,"end":50},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0000003"},{"id":"T21","span":{"begin":317,"end":329},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0000003"}],"text":"For instance, the WHO has estimated a reproduction number of 1.4–2.5, Li and colleagues (Li et al., 2020) have computed a slightly higher value of 2.2 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.9), while in several other mathematical models which have been so far devised and released as pre-prints or undergone peer-review and published, the reproduction number varies from 1.3 to 4.7."}
LitCovid-sentences
{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T104","span":{"begin":0,"end":360},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"For instance, the WHO has estimated a reproduction number of 1.4–2.5, Li and colleagues (Li et al., 2020) have computed a slightly higher value of 2.2 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.9), while in several other mathematical models which have been so far devised and released as pre-prints or undergone peer-review and published, the reproduction number varies from 1.3 to 4.7."}