PMC:7029158 / 15702-16229 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T80","span":{"begin":177,"end":178},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T81","span":{"begin":462,"end":463},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T82","span":{"begin":488,"end":489},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001021"}],"text":"We repeated the procedure as above but fitted our model to the data of confirmed cases between January 23rd and February 1st, 2020 (Fig. 3 ) and observed the improved δI(t). As a result, in comparison with the results in Fig. 2, we obtained higher projected cumulative confirmed cases and delayed peak time.\nFig. 3 Best fitting of the model to the data of cumulative confirmed cases between January 23rd and February 1st, 2020: the projected number of infected (A), quarantined infected (B), and cumulative confirmed cases (C)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T99","span":{"begin":0,"end":173},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T100","span":{"begin":174,"end":307},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T101","span":{"begin":308,"end":527},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"We repeated the procedure as above but fitted our model to the data of confirmed cases between January 23rd and February 1st, 2020 (Fig. 3 ) and observed the improved δI(t). As a result, in comparison with the results in Fig. 2, we obtained higher projected cumulative confirmed cases and delayed peak time.\nFig. 3 Best fitting of the model to the data of cumulative confirmed cases between January 23rd and February 1st, 2020: the projected number of infected (A), quarantined infected (B), and cumulative confirmed cases (C)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"122","span":{"begin":452,"end":460},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"123","span":{"begin":478,"end":486},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A122","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"122","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A123","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"123","obj":"MESH:D007239"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"We repeated the procedure as above but fitted our model to the data of confirmed cases between January 23rd and February 1st, 2020 (Fig. 3 ) and observed the improved δI(t). As a result, in comparison with the results in Fig. 2, we obtained higher projected cumulative confirmed cases and delayed peak time.\nFig. 3 Best fitting of the model to the data of cumulative confirmed cases between January 23rd and February 1st, 2020: the projected number of infected (A), quarantined infected (B), and cumulative confirmed cases (C)."}