PMC:6705338 / 23881-24792 JSONTXT

{"target":"http://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/6705338","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"6705338","source_url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/6705338","text":"In an experimental study comparing fourteen different types of meshes commonly used for the repair of abdominal wall hernia defects involving synthetic and non-barrier (tissue separating) meshes and biological artificial prostheses, Gaertner et al.14 concluded that all meshes determined the appearance of visceral adhesions. Non-stick barrier-free synthetic fabrics have a more extensive adherence compromise. Biological meshes had a significantly lower area of impairment. In turn, the tissue-separating synthetic meshes had an area of adhesion comparable to biological ones. In an experimental study, Lamber et al.16, comparing a pollen mesh covered with porcine collagen and one with polypropylene, reached a similar conclusion. Both meshes determined the appearance of adhesions, although the tissue-separating mesh presented a much lower compromising surface than the non-stick barrier polypropylene mesh.","tracks":[{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"31432994-20401733-396051","span":{"begin":248,"end":250},"obj":"20401733"}],"attributes":[{"subj":"31432994-20401733-396051","pred":"source","obj":"2_test"}]}],"config":{"attribute types":[{"pred":"source","value type":"selection","values":[{"id":"2_test","color":"#9393ec","default":true}]}]}}