PMC:6194691 / 245280-246085 JSONTXT

{"target":"https://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/6194691","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"6194691","source_url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/6194691","text":"9 Charles Nicholson and Anthony Gardner-Medwin (personal communications reported in [41]) have observed that the adequacy of diffusion to explain movements of solutes in the interstitium and the observed symmetrical spread does not preclude the existence of net flows of the order of those proposed by Cserr and coworkers [83, 130] or Rosenberg et al. [65]. It is not clear whether the flows envisaged in the glymphatic hypothesis are sufficiently larger that they should produce observable asymmetry in the spread of markers. Comparison of the flow required if glymphatic circulation accounts for the movement of markers like inulin through the perivascular spaces (0.6 µL g−1 min−1 or more as discussed above) and the largest flow that could have been missed by Smith et al. [79] would be very welcome.","divisions":[{"label":"label","span":{"begin":0,"end":1}}],"tracks":[]}