PMC:5491911 / 12647-13927 JSONTXT

{"target":"http://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/5491911","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"5491911","source_url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/5491911","text":"A two-way repeated measures' ANOVA was performed to evaluate working and reference memory errors with the “acquisition days” as the within-subjects factor and “experimental groups” as the between-subjects factor. A significant effect was observed for reference memory error [p \u003c 0.001), F(7,378) =64.19], “experimental groups” [p \u003c 0.01), F(8,54)=4.00], and the “acquisition days” by “experimental groups” interaction [p \u003c 0.01), F (56,378) =1.51]. The test also showed a significant effect on the working memory error [p \u003c 0.001), F(7,378) =76.20], “experimental groups” [p \u003c 0.01), F8,54)=4.26], and the “acquisition days” by “experimental groups” interaction [p \u003c 0.03), F(56,378)=1.46]. The data showed that both working and reference memory errors during the acquisition phase changed compared to the days of training which were different among the study groups (Figure 2(Fig. 2)). The rats in the SD groups showed more memory errors (working and reference) compared to the control and grid animals. Fewer errors were observed for the rats of SD+curcumin group in comparison to the SD animals (p \u003c 0.03). This demonstrated that concomitant treatment of curcumin during SD caused fewer errors during evaluation of the working and reference memories in the acquisition session.","tracks":[]}