PMC:4502374 / 21700-23204 JSONTXT

{"target":"http://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/4502374","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"4502374","source_url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/4502374","text":"Rust:\nThe frequency distribution based on the pooled data for TL/LA, number of SL/LA, and incubation period (IncPer) showed strong biased toward resistance, because 41 individuals and the resistant parent presented no lesions in either experiments (Figure 2, A and B). The susceptible parent A. ipaënsis K 30076 showed greater susceptibility than the control, A. hypogaea cv. Runner IAC 886, in all components tested: larger SI, TL/LA and SL/LA, and shorter IncPer than the susceptible control (File S1). Seventeen individuals had greater SI, SL/LA, and TL/LA than the susceptible control. In addition, five had shorter IncPer (File S1). As expected, the number and size of lesions were negatively correlated with Incubation period (Pearson r = – 0.6, P \u003c 0.005). No chlorosis was observed on any accession of the F6/F7 population. On leaves of some of the less-susceptible genotypes, necrotic areas corresponding to colonies aborted at a late developmental stage were observed.\nFigure 2 Frequency distribution of rust resistance, peg, and seed characteristics (A−F) in recombinant inbred lines (F6/F7 RILs) derived from a cross of A. ipaënsis K 30076 (Ai) with A. magna K 30097 (Am). For rust tests, A. hypogaea cv. Runner IAC 886 (R) was the susceptible control. With the exception of pod constriction, for all traits the means of the parents are significantly different (P \u003c 0.05). In (A) genotypes without symptoms (therefore without incubation period), this trait was artificially tabulated as 200.","divisions":[{"label":"title","span":{"begin":0,"end":5}},{"label":"p","span":{"begin":6,"end":978}},{"label":"label","span":{"begin":979,"end":987}}],"tracks":[]}