PMC:4264897 / 34140-34950 JSONTXT

{"project":"MyTest","denotations":[{"id":"25512844-23637808-26483248","span":{"begin":258,"end":262},"obj":"23637808"},{"id":"25512844-23637808-26483249","span":{"begin":386,"end":390},"obj":"23637808"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/testbase"},{"prefix":"UniProtKB","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/"},{"prefix":"uniprot","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/"}],"text":"We found that SMA better describes the scaling relationship between body mass and body size than OLS regression whether we use the SMA slope from the reference population (2.642 ± 0.11 vs. 2.011 ± 0.088; z  = 4.54, P  \u003c   0.001) or from the Kelly and Tawes (2013) data set (2.32 ± 0.088 vs. 2.011 ± 0.088; z  = 2.46, P  =   0.014). Using the SMA slope derived from the Kelly and Tawes (2013) data set (i.e., b SMA = 2.32) produced results that were very similar (sex: F  =   2.57, df = 1,171, P  =   0.111; diet: F  =   0.001, df = 1,171, P  =   0.980) to those using the slope from the reference population (i.e., b SMA = 2.642). This might not always be the case, however, and so we recommend that biologists use b SMA from our reference populations in their calculations of in G. texensis or A. domesticus."}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"25512844-23637808-26483248","span":{"begin":258,"end":262},"obj":"23637808"},{"id":"25512844-23637808-26483249","span":{"begin":386,"end":390},"obj":"23637808"}],"text":"We found that SMA better describes the scaling relationship between body mass and body size than OLS regression whether we use the SMA slope from the reference population (2.642 ± 0.11 vs. 2.011 ± 0.088; z  = 4.54, P  \u003c   0.001) or from the Kelly and Tawes (2013) data set (2.32 ± 0.088 vs. 2.011 ± 0.088; z  = 2.46, P  =   0.014). Using the SMA slope derived from the Kelly and Tawes (2013) data set (i.e., b SMA = 2.32) produced results that were very similar (sex: F  =   2.57, df = 1,171, P  =   0.111; diet: F  =   0.001, df = 1,171, P  =   0.980) to those using the slope from the reference population (i.e., b SMA = 2.642). This might not always be the case, however, and so we recommend that biologists use b SMA from our reference populations in their calculations of in G. texensis or A. domesticus."}