PMC:3839092 / 15015-16070 JSONTXT

{"target":"https://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/3839092","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"3839092","source_url":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/3839092","text":"Whole-brain group comparison\nNo voxel-wise group comparisons for FA, MD, RD, or AD withstood correction for multiple comparisons. An exploratory analysis using a threshold of p \u003c 0.001, uncorrected with clusters exceeding 10 contiguous voxels, revealed 4 significant clusters (Table 2, Figure 1). Compared with HC, the MDD group had lower FA in the anterior cingulum, and lower AD in the anterior corona radiata (ACR). However, the MDD group also had greater FA and lower RD in the posterior cingulum compared to HC.\nTable 2 Voxel-wise group comparison results. Units for AD and RD = mm2/s. Coordinates in MNI space. Threshold p \u003c 0.001, uncorrected, k \u003e 10. COG, center of gravity; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; AD, axial diffusivity; WM, white matter; L, left; R, right; ACR, anterior corona radiata.\nFigure 1 (A) Increased WM integrity in the MDD group vs. HC in the posterior cingulum near the hippocampus; (B) decreased WM integrity in the MDD group vs. HC in the anterior cingulum near the precuneus.\n\nW","divisions":[{"label":"Title","span":{"begin":0,"end":28}},{"label":"Table caption","span":{"begin":517,"end":848}},{"label":"Figure caption","span":{"begin":848,"end":1054}}],"tracks":[]}