data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3095d/3095d1f938d0c8f2139c2adb688e5bb1c8d201ef" alt="Logo"
PMC:2948162 / 9430-10336
Annnotations
{"target":"https://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/2948162","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"2948162","source_url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/2948162","text":"Signal intensity on the T2W and LGE images within the territory of the IRA was increased in all patients. The AAR and IS were 26 ± 12% and 15 ± 11% of LV mass, respectively. MVO was observed in 49 (54%) and IMH in 39 patients (43%), and both were always located subendocardially within the infarct core. IMH was only observed in patients with MVO. A significant correlation was found between MVO and IMH extent (r = 0.8, p \u003c 0.001, Fig. 1), but absolute MVO extent was larger than that of IMH [3.1 ml (IQR 1.6–5.3) vs. 2.2 ml (IQR 1.6–3.5), p = 0.04].\nFig. 1 Correlation between IMH and MVO. a Original scale values. b Log transformed values. A good linear correlation is seen between MVO and IMH (r = 0.86, p \u003c 0.001). Open circles indicate observed values and stars indicate predicted values in the MVO(+)/IMH(-) group. Note that most of the predicted values are within the lower range of observed values","divisions":[{"label":"label","span":{"begin":552,"end":558}}],"tracks":[]}