PMC:2854328 / 23166-23683 JSONTXT

{"target":"https://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/2854328","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"2854328","source_url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/2854328","text":"CONCLUSIONS\nDurafil VS was more affected by bleaching and more subject to staining than TPH3.\nIn-office bleaching may remove surface stains from composite restorations, but it will not whiten unstained ones.\nThe two light-activated bleaching systems were more effective in removing surface stains from composite than was a chemically activated one.\nIncreased surface roughness of composites as a result of bleaching appears to be dependent on the bleaching agent used as well as the composite material type and shade.","divisions":[{"label":"title","span":{"begin":0,"end":11}},{"label":"p","span":{"begin":12,"end":93}},{"label":"p","span":{"begin":94,"end":207}},{"label":"p","span":{"begin":208,"end":348}}],"tracks":[]}