PMC:2854002 / 24164-24647
Annnotations
MyTest
{"project":"MyTest","denotations":[{"id":"19961220-15926558-28495516","span":{"begin":362,"end":363},"obj":"15926558"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/testbase"},{"prefix":"UniProtKB","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/"},{"prefix":"uniprot","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/"}],"text":"Figure 3a and b show the improved agreement compared to Figures 1b and 2b, respectively, between measured free aqueous and biolipid concentrations with respective estimates based on a linear AOC partitioning coefficient KAOC calculated according to the relationship presented in Schwarzenbach et al. (19) shown in eq 10 (instead of assuming KAOC is equal to KOW(6)) and a linear BC partitioning coefficient KBC,lin, calculated according to eq 9 (instead of using KFr,BC and n = 0.7)."}
2_test
{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"19961220-15926558-28495516","span":{"begin":362,"end":363},"obj":"15926558"}],"text":"Figure 3a and b show the improved agreement compared to Figures 1b and 2b, respectively, between measured free aqueous and biolipid concentrations with respective estimates based on a linear AOC partitioning coefficient KAOC calculated according to the relationship presented in Schwarzenbach et al. (19) shown in eq 10 (instead of assuming KAOC is equal to KOW(6)) and a linear BC partitioning coefficient KBC,lin, calculated according to eq 9 (instead of using KFr,BC and n = 0.7)."}