PMC:2813722 / 18108-19545 JSONTXT

{"target":"http://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/2813722","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"2813722","source_url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/2813722","text":"No significant effects or interactions were found for N2 latencies (ηp2\u003c0.07 in all cases). The ANOVA on N2 amplitudes revealed a marginally significant main effect for cultural group, F(1, 35) = 3.78, p \u003c 0.06, ηp2=0.10 (Chinese M = −6.01 μV, SE = 0.89; European M = −3.67 μV, SE = 0.82), and a significant effect of laterality, F(1, 35) = 15.05, p \u003c 0.001, ηp2=0.30 (Right M = −5.72 μV, SE = 0.65; Left M = −3.95 μV, SE = 0.64). These effects were qualified by a significant Go/no-go condition × Laterality interaction, F(1, 35) = 110.64, p \u003c 0.001, ηp2=0.76, and a significant Cultural group × Go/no-go condition × Laterality interaction, F(1, 35) = 5.40, p \u003c 0.05, ηp2=0.13. Post hoc tests examining the effect of cultural group revealed that Chinese-Canadian children showed larger (i.e., more negative) N2 amplitudes than European-Canadian children on no-go trials on the right side of the scalp, p \u003c 0.05 (Chinese M = −9.13 μV, SE = 1.14; European M = −5.79 μV, SE = 1.05; Figure 4A), as well as on go trials on the left side of the scalp, p \u003c 0.05 (Chinese M = −7.66 μV, SE = 0.96; European M = −4.59 μV, SE = 0.89; Figure 4B), but that there were no group differences on no-go trials on the left or on go trials on the right. The three-way interaction reflected the fact that Chinese-Canadian children showed a stronger effect of laterality on no-go trials (ηp2=0.59) than did European-Canadian children on go trials (ηp2=0.16).","tracks":[]}