PMC:2373858 / 24597-25497 JSONTXT

{"project":"0_colil","denotations":[{"id":"18270714-15728612-59929","span":{"begin":246,"end":248},"obj":"15728612"},{"id":"18270714-16373758-59930","span":{"begin":331,"end":332},"obj":"16373758"}],"text":"The slow dynamic analysis resembles the evaluation as routinely performed in the clinical workflow in our hospital. The performance of the workstation used in the slow dynamic evaluation has already been investigated and proven by Wiener et al. [27] in the evaluation of breast lesions prior to surgical treatment. Schnall et al. [4] evaluated the performance of both dynamic and morphological features in 854 women with 995 lesions. The results of their multivariate evaluation based on both morphological and relatively slow dynamic lesion characteristics resulted in a similar diagnostic accuracy (AUC values of 0.87 and 0.88) compared with the results obtained in the slow dynamic analyses of our study (0.85 and 0.83). Our results found in the slow dynamic analysis are, therefore, considered representative for the diagnostic performance of an experienced radiologist in this group of patients."}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"18270714-15728612-29367326","span":{"begin":246,"end":248},"obj":"15728612"},{"id":"18270714-16373758-29367327","span":{"begin":331,"end":332},"obj":"16373758"}],"text":"The slow dynamic analysis resembles the evaluation as routinely performed in the clinical workflow in our hospital. The performance of the workstation used in the slow dynamic evaluation has already been investigated and proven by Wiener et al. [27] in the evaluation of breast lesions prior to surgical treatment. Schnall et al. [4] evaluated the performance of both dynamic and morphological features in 854 women with 995 lesions. The results of their multivariate evaluation based on both morphological and relatively slow dynamic lesion characteristics resulted in a similar diagnostic accuracy (AUC values of 0.87 and 0.88) compared with the results obtained in the slow dynamic analyses of our study (0.85 and 0.83). Our results found in the slow dynamic analysis are, therefore, considered representative for the diagnostic performance of an experienced radiologist in this group of patients."}

{"project":"TEST0","denotations":[{"id":"18270714-130-136-59929","span":{"begin":246,"end":248},"obj":"[\"15728612\"]"},{"id":"18270714-16-21-59930","span":{"begin":331,"end":332},"obj":"[\"16373758\"]"}],"text":"The slow dynamic analysis resembles the evaluation as routinely performed in the clinical workflow in our hospital. The performance of the workstation used in the slow dynamic evaluation has already been investigated and proven by Wiener et al. [27] in the evaluation of breast lesions prior to surgical treatment. Schnall et al. [4] evaluated the performance of both dynamic and morphological features in 854 women with 995 lesions. The results of their multivariate evaluation based on both morphological and relatively slow dynamic lesion characteristics resulted in a similar diagnostic accuracy (AUC values of 0.87 and 0.88) compared with the results obtained in the slow dynamic analyses of our study (0.85 and 0.83). Our results found in the slow dynamic analysis are, therefore, considered representative for the diagnostic performance of an experienced radiologist in this group of patients."}

{"project":"MyTest","denotations":[{"id":"18270714-15728612-29367326","span":{"begin":246,"end":248},"obj":"15728612"},{"id":"18270714-16373758-29367327","span":{"begin":331,"end":332},"obj":"16373758"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/testbase"},{"prefix":"UniProtKB","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/"},{"prefix":"uniprot","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/"}],"text":"The slow dynamic analysis resembles the evaluation as routinely performed in the clinical workflow in our hospital. The performance of the workstation used in the slow dynamic evaluation has already been investigated and proven by Wiener et al. [27] in the evaluation of breast lesions prior to surgical treatment. Schnall et al. [4] evaluated the performance of both dynamic and morphological features in 854 women with 995 lesions. The results of their multivariate evaluation based on both morphological and relatively slow dynamic lesion characteristics resulted in a similar diagnostic accuracy (AUC values of 0.87 and 0.88) compared with the results obtained in the slow dynamic analyses of our study (0.85 and 0.83). Our results found in the slow dynamic analysis are, therefore, considered representative for the diagnostic performance of an experienced radiologist in this group of patients."}