![Logo](/assets/logo-d3f1fdf60522f0983e71f9fcc720cb7da5b55c0b748ed5bded3d2fbf81387bf0.png)
CORD-19:cb16d307afaecebd683e6d74c8b501ed54b0c9a4 / 29784-30030
Annnotations
CORD-19-Sentences
{"project":"CORD-19-Sentences","denotations":[{"id":"TextSentencer_T177","span":{"begin":0,"end":246},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T46422","span":{"begin":0,"end":246},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"In the maximal electroshock (MES) test, compound 99 performed the best protective potency with the protection ratio of 79.76% and no significant toxicity was determined at the dosage of 25 mg/kg, while in the analgesic test it showed weak effect."}
CORD-19_Custom_license_subset
{"project":"CORD-19_Custom_license_subset","denotations":[{"id":"T177","span":{"begin":0,"end":246},"obj":"Sentence"}],"text":"In the maximal electroshock (MES) test, compound 99 performed the best protective potency with the protection ratio of 79.76% and no significant toxicity was determined at the dosage of 25 mg/kg, while in the analgesic test it showed weak effect."}