CORD-19:48b81081bbcbdbea648394d8bf2adf370b36e44c / 916734-916886 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    CORD-19-Sentences

    {"project":"CORD-19-Sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T22388","span":{"begin":0,"end":152},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"The evidence provided by RCTs was graded in four different levels: best (80% or more), good (60-79%), promising (30-59%) and poor or no evidence (\u003c30%)."}

    Epistemic_Statements

    {"project":"Epistemic_Statements","denotations":[{"id":"T2141","span":{"begin":0,"end":152},"obj":"Epistemic_statement"}],"text":"The evidence provided by RCTs was graded in four different levels: best (80% or more), good (60-79%), promising (30-59%) and poor or no evidence (\u003c30%)."}

    CORD-19_Custom_license_subset

    {"project":"CORD-19_Custom_license_subset","denotations":[{"id":"T286","span":{"begin":0,"end":152},"obj":"Sentence"}],"text":"The evidence provided by RCTs was graded in four different levels: best (80% or more), good (60-79%), promising (30-59%) and poor or no evidence (\u003c30%)."}