CORD-19:112d99dcf6554496b5dd4ce4696ff2850647388a / 16022-16741 JSONTXT

{"project":"CORD-19_Custom_license_subset","denotations":[{"id":"T76","span":{"begin":0,"end":719},"obj":"Sentence"}],"text":"In regard to the location at which autopsies were performed in a suspected highly infectious remains case, 58% (47/81) stated there was a separate autopsy area where no other autopsies were being performed at the same time; 20% (16/81) stated they do not examine suspected highly infectious remains at their facility; and 22% indicated 'other', which include not having a separate room/in the regular autopsy area (n = 4), altering protocol to limit staff and only have that single case autopsied at the time if there was not a separate room available (n = 3), performing autopsy in a negative pressure disaster portable morgue unit (n = 1), and that autopsy was contingent on the case load and space available (n = 1)."}

{"project":"CORD-19-Sentences","denotations":[{"id":"TextSentencer_T76","span":{"begin":0,"end":719},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"In regard to the location at which autopsies were performed in a suspected highly infectious remains case, 58% (47/81) stated there was a separate autopsy area where no other autopsies were being performed at the same time; 20% (16/81) stated they do not examine suspected highly infectious remains at their facility; and 22% indicated 'other', which include not having a separate room/in the regular autopsy area (n = 4), altering protocol to limit staff and only have that single case autopsied at the time if there was not a separate room available (n = 3), performing autopsy in a negative pressure disaster portable morgue unit (n = 1), and that autopsy was contingent on the case load and space available (n = 1)."}

{"project":"CORD-19-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T84","span":{"begin":82,"end":92},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T85","span":{"begin":280,"end":290},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T98157","span":{"begin":82,"end":92},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T92246","span":{"begin":280,"end":290},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A84","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T84","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A85","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T85","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A71222","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T98157","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A61877","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T92246","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"}],"text":"In regard to the location at which autopsies were performed in a suspected highly infectious remains case, 58% (47/81) stated there was a separate autopsy area where no other autopsies were being performed at the same time; 20% (16/81) stated they do not examine suspected highly infectious remains at their facility; and 22% indicated 'other', which include not having a separate room/in the regular autopsy area (n = 4), altering protocol to limit staff and only have that single case autopsied at the time if there was not a separate room available (n = 3), performing autopsy in a negative pressure disaster portable morgue unit (n = 1), and that autopsy was contingent on the case load and space available (n = 1)."}