| Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
| T62 |
0-132 |
Sentence |
denotes |
This paper uses a fair allocation approach to identify and analyze ethical concerns arising in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic. |
| T63 |
133-335 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Fair allocation is taken to refer to “arrangements that allow equal geographic, economic and cultural access to available services for all in equal need of care.”11 Whitehead, M., & Dahlgren, G. (2006). |
| T64 |
336-401 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Concepts and Principles for Tackling Social Inequities in Health: |
| T65 |
402-422 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Levelling up Part 1. |
| T66 |
423-472 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2006. |
| T67 |
473-580 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The arrangements can be systemic or politically driven; they can be the product of neglect or indifference. |
| T68 |
581-927 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The approach shares the view that “all systematic differences in health between different socioeconomic groups within a country can be considered unfair and, therefore, classed as health inequities, [and these]. . . are directly or indirectly generated by social, economic and environmental factors and structurally influenced lifestyles.12 Ibid. |
| T69 |
928-1270 |
Sentence |
denotes |
While highlighting the existing access or lack of access in the context of very closely intertwined social and health indicators, this paper uses equity and equality interchangeably: “in the public health community the phrase social inequalities in health carries the same connotation of health differences that are unfair and unjust.13 Ibid. |
