2.3. Media Richness and Information Influencing Factors Daft and Lenge [66] firstly come up with media richness theory, which gradually became popular with the emerge of electronic media. Media Richness theory regards communication channels as possessing many characteristics to carry information. The rich information is more able to reduce equivocality than lean information [66]. As a theory which refers to the relative ability of a communication channel to deliver messages [67], it includes four dimensions: (a) immediate feedback, (b) multiple cues, (c) language variety, and (d) personal focus [68,69]. Media richness theory has been used in multiple fields. In computer science fields, integrated media richness theory is used combined with flow theory, and the technology acceptance model to investigate how they can explain the acceptance of e-learning technology [70]. It is also an important factor influencing the customer experience in e-commerce [71]. This theory represents the structure of richness (e.g., multiple cues and responsive feedback) to determine the level of richness. Moreover, it also has been used to indicate the effect of different types of communication media (see, e.g., [72,73]). However, on social media platforms, media richness theory research generally focuses on communicators’ choices of channels (e.g., a face-to-face meeting vs. a teleconference), few of them study whether rich media influent the effect of information transfer [66,74,75]. For example, visual images are more powerful tools for communicating messages regarding all aspects of organizations [44]. In particular, if a website uses multimedia functions and frames, it would have a higher level of media richness than text alone. The multi-perspective medium could affect the effectiveness of the information disclosure. In other words, media richness theory assumes that media vary in degree of “richness”, or the “ability of information to change understanding within a time interval” ([66], p. 561). Thus, “richer” media are characterized by the use of responsive feedback, multiple cues, appropriate use of language, and a “tailored frame of reference” [76]. As discussed above, SM allows diverse multimedia content to be published, including images, videos, or hyperlinks. The importance of media for conveying information has been highlighted [77,78]. They argue that plain text is no longer the best type of medium to articulate information, and that multimedia is the most effective way to enhance the potency of a given message. Media analyses of Facebook also conclude that the use of pictures encourages citizen interaction, with more likes and comments than text-only publications [1,59]. Similarly, a media analysis study on Twitter [79] also shows that messages with a high level of richness, such as images and photos, tend to have a greater response from citizens. Therefore, we come up with the following hypothesis: Hypothesis 3.  Higher media richness (picture, video, web-links) would generate a higher engagement rate. In addition, we also assume that other information influencing factors potentially affect public engagement, which are as follows: Text length: While some scholars found the relationship between text length and engagement, some research indicates that longer text could get more attention [80]. For example, an organization’s lengthy tweet could significantly reduce the negative sentiment of customers’ tweets [81]. It could be explained that longer sentence requires more time and resources, so it might positively influent users’ engagement and develop a strong online community [82]. Li et al. [83] found that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the content length of most types of situational information has a positive correlation with the propagation scale. Another researcher assumed that a longer length content may include enough detail and have been recognized to positively affect the feedback [84]. Therefore, we come up with the following hypothesis: Hypothesis 4.  Longer posts would generate more engagement than shorter posts. Information source: In addition to releasing original information, the official account could also be operated as a news aggregator. Because of multiple source layers in online information transmission, the official account frequently cites some important information from other sources. Compared to the original source (the account that is actually responsible for creation of the core content), there are another type of posts with visible source, which can be defined as “the source seen by the receiver to be delivering the message or content” [85]. Until now, it is unclear that whether a post is original or not would influence the public engagement. Some similar research found that people are more likely to comply with the direct message from official source [86]. When facing a crisis or disaster, local departments were more important sources than routine times, and people regarded local government sources as references [87,88]. Therefore, we come up with the last hypothesis: Hypothesis 5.  The original post will lead to more engagement than posts from the other source.