PMC:7366549 / 13702-14143 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"207","span":{"begin":31,"end":39},"obj":"Species"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A207","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"207","obj":"Tax:143291"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Twenty one of the 508 RSs from Pteropus spp. bats screened were tested positive for the BtCoV (Table I). These positive bats belonged to Kerala (n=12), Himachal Pradesh (n=2), Puducherry (n=6) and Tamil Nadu (n=1). The TS specimens of the same bats were tested negative for BtCoV. The TS specimens of RS-negative (n=42) bats were also screened and found to be negative (Table I). A total of 25 bats from both the species were found positive."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T41","span":{"begin":219,"end":221},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T43","span":{"begin":285,"end":287},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T45","span":{"begin":301,"end":303},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A41","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T41","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0010979"},{"id":"A42","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T41","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0016455"},{"id":"A43","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T43","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0010979"},{"id":"A44","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T43","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0016455"},{"id":"A45","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T45","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0010725"}],"text":"Twenty one of the 508 RSs from Pteropus spp. bats screened were tested positive for the BtCoV (Table I). These positive bats belonged to Kerala (n=12), Himachal Pradesh (n=2), Puducherry (n=6) and Tamil Nadu (n=1). The TS specimens of the same bats were tested negative for BtCoV. The TS specimens of RS-negative (n=42) bats were also screened and found to be negative (Table I). A total of 25 bats from both the species were found positive."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T164","span":{"begin":45,"end":49},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_9397"},{"id":"T165","span":{"begin":64,"end":70},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T166","span":{"begin":120,"end":124},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_9397"},{"id":"T167","span":{"begin":244,"end":248},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_9397"},{"id":"T168","span":{"begin":254,"end":260},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T169","span":{"begin":301,"end":303},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0008882"},{"id":"T170","span":{"begin":320,"end":324},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_9397"},{"id":"T171","span":{"begin":380,"end":381},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T172","span":{"begin":394,"end":398},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_9397"}],"text":"Twenty one of the 508 RSs from Pteropus spp. bats screened were tested positive for the BtCoV (Table I). These positive bats belonged to Kerala (n=12), Himachal Pradesh (n=2), Puducherry (n=6) and Tamil Nadu (n=1). The TS specimens of the same bats were tested negative for BtCoV. The TS specimens of RS-negative (n=42) bats were also screened and found to be negative (Table I). A total of 25 bats from both the species were found positive."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T39","span":{"begin":219,"end":221},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T40","span":{"begin":285,"end":287},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T41","span":{"begin":301,"end":303},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A39","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T39","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_73664"},{"id":"A40","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T40","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_73664"},{"id":"A41","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T41","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_73819"}],"text":"Twenty one of the 508 RSs from Pteropus spp. bats screened were tested positive for the BtCoV (Table I). These positive bats belonged to Kerala (n=12), Himachal Pradesh (n=2), Puducherry (n=6) and Tamil Nadu (n=1). The TS specimens of the same bats were tested negative for BtCoV. The TS specimens of RS-negative (n=42) bats were also screened and found to be negative (Table I). A total of 25 bats from both the species were found positive."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T115","span":{"begin":105,"end":214},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T116","span":{"begin":215,"end":280},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T117","span":{"begin":281,"end":379},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T118","span":{"begin":380,"end":441},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Twenty one of the 508 RSs from Pteropus spp. bats screened were tested positive for the BtCoV (Table I). These positive bats belonged to Kerala (n=12), Himachal Pradesh (n=2), Puducherry (n=6) and Tamil Nadu (n=1). The TS specimens of the same bats were tested negative for BtCoV. The TS specimens of RS-negative (n=42) bats were also screened and found to be negative (Table I). A total of 25 bats from both the species were found positive."}

{"project":"Zoonoses_partialAnnotation","denotations":[{"id":"T132","span":{"begin":0,"end":10},"obj":"Number"},{"id":"T133","span":{"begin":18,"end":21},"obj":"Number"},{"id":"T154","span":{"begin":137,"end":143},"obj":"Area"},{"id":"T165","span":{"begin":197,"end":207},"obj":"Area"},{"id":"T172","span":{"begin":176,"end":186},"obj":"Area"},{"id":"T199","span":{"begin":152,"end":168},"obj":"Area"},{"id":"T215","span":{"begin":209,"end":210},"obj":"Unit"},{"id":"T216","span":{"begin":211,"end":212},"obj":"Number"},{"id":"T217","span":{"begin":147,"end":149},"obj":"Number"},{"id":"T218","span":{"begin":172,"end":173},"obj":"Number"},{"id":"T219","span":{"begin":190,"end":191},"obj":"Number"},{"id":"T220","span":{"begin":145,"end":146},"obj":"Unit"},{"id":"T221","span":{"begin":170,"end":171},"obj":"Unit"},{"id":"T222","span":{"begin":188,"end":189},"obj":"Unit"},{"id":"T223","span":{"begin":391,"end":393},"obj":"Number"},{"id":"T224","span":{"begin":314,"end":315},"obj":"Unit"},{"id":"T225","span":{"begin":316,"end":318},"obj":"Number"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A39","pred":"Memo","subj":"T172","obj":"MESH:D007194"},{"id":"A21","pred":"Memo","subj":"T154","obj":"MESH:D007194"},{"id":"A32","pred":"Memo","subj":"T165","obj":"MESH:D007194"},{"id":"A66","pred":"Memo","subj":"T199","obj":"MESH:D007194"}],"text":"Twenty one of the 508 RSs from Pteropus spp. bats screened were tested positive for the BtCoV (Table I). These positive bats belonged to Kerala (n=12), Himachal Pradesh (n=2), Puducherry (n=6) and Tamil Nadu (n=1). The TS specimens of the same bats were tested negative for BtCoV. The TS specimens of RS-negative (n=42) bats were also screened and found to be negative (Table I). A total of 25 bats from both the species were found positive."}