PMC:7060038 / 24246-24583 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"183","span":{"begin":221,"end":226},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"184","span":{"begin":308,"end":316},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A183","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"183","obj":"MESH:D005334"},{"id":"A184","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"184","obj":"MESH:D007239"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":" instrument sensitivity in non-contact infrared thermal scanners used in traveller screening (Table 1). Considering the effectiveness of departure or arrival screening only (Figure 2—figures supplement 1, 2), we see that fever screening is the dominant contributor in each case, but that the risk of missing infected travellers due to un"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T82","span":{"begin":1,"end":11},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000968"}],"text":" instrument sensitivity in non-contact infrared thermal scanners used in traveller screening (Table 1). Considering the effectiveness of departure or arrival screening only (Figure 2—figures supplement 1, 2), we see that fever screening is the dominant contributor in each case, but that the risk of missing infected travellers due to un"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T33","span":{"begin":221,"end":226},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A33","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T33","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0001945"}],"text":" instrument sensitivity in non-contact infrared thermal scanners used in traveller screening (Table 1). Considering the effectiveness of departure or arrival screening only (Figure 2—figures supplement 1, 2), we see that fever screening is the dominant contributor in each case, but that the risk of missing infected travellers due to un"}