Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant to D.S.P.A. and scholarships for T.d.E.S.F., S.M.K., M.F.C., and J.M.S.), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, grant to D.S.P.A. and scholarship to. G.L.T.), and the Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES, scholarship to M.F.S.D.).

Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/9/8/386/s1. Figure S1. Selection cycles of affinity using phages displayed by X6 and CX8C libraries with 1A3 mAb; Figure S2. Selection cycles of the phages with X6 and CX8C libraries with 2C7 mAb; Figure S3. Binding of selected phages to 1A3 (A) and 2C7 (B) mAb immobilized on 96-well plate; Figure S4. SDS-PAGE electrophoresis of peptide-pIII fusion after purification; Figure S5. Western blot analysis with peptides-pIII; Figure S6. Macrophage differentiation; Figure S7. Effect of LPS on mRNA expression in bone marrow-derived macrophages evaluated with qPCR; Figure S8. M2 macrophage phenotype. Table S1. Parameters obtained from the IFT fitting; Table S2. Parameters obtained from the model fitting assuming circular ring; Table S3. Primers sequence.
Click here for additional data file.

Author Contributions
Conceptualization: T.d.E.S.F., D.S.P.A., R.J.G., and D.F.J.K.; Data curation: J.M., M.F.S.D., C.L.P.O., R.J.G., G.L.T., F.W., T.d.E.S.F., and D.S.P.A.; Formal analysis: T.d.E.S.F., J.M., M.F.S.D., C.L.P.O., R.J.G., G.L.T., F.W., M.F.C., and S.M.K.; Funding acquisition: D.S.P.A. and R.J.G.; Investigation: T.d.E.S.F., S.M.K., G.L.T., J.M., M.F.S.D., and M.F.C.; Methodology: T.d.E.S.F., G.L.T., J.M., M.F.S.D., and F.W.; Project administration: D.S.P.A. and R.J.G.; Resources: D.S.P.A., R.J.G., and C.L.P.O.; Software: T.d.E.S.F.; Supervision: D.S.P.A., R.J.G., D.F.J.K., and C.L.P.O.; Validation: T.d.E.S.F., J.M., M.F.S.D., R.J.G., C.L.P.O., F.W., G.L.T., and M.F.C.; Visualization: T.d.E.S.F., S.M.K., G.L.T., and D.S.P.A.; Writing, original draft preparation: T.d.E.S.F., S.M.K., G.L.T., and D.S.P.A.; Writing, review and editing: T.d.E.S.F., S.M.K., R.J.G., D.F.J.K., C.L.P.O., and D.S.P.A.

Funding
This study was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; grant 2012/51316-5 to D.S.P.A.) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; grant 573663/2008-4 to National Institute of Science and Technology for Pharmaceutical Innovation-INCT_if/CNPq). T.d.E.S.F., S.M.K., M.F.C. and J.M.S. were supported by scholarships from FAPESP. G.L.T. was supported by a scholarship from CNPq. M.F.S.D. was supported by a scholarship from CAPES. C.L.P.O. acknowledges support from FAPESP and CNPq.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.