Table 2  Comparison of theoretical and empirical pattern statistic mean and standard deviation on Mycoplasma genitalium.
m   S   σ  S ^   MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGtbWugaqcaaaa@2DEB@  σ ^   MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaaiiGacuWFdpWCgaqcaaaa@2E86@
1  42.48  0.38  42.47  0.40
2  44.62  0.78  44.62  0.81
3  55.96  1.49  56.02  1.52
4  55.06  3.39  55.48  3.48
5  56.49  10.35  57.21*  9.09*
We consider the pattern W = acgtacgt with Nobs = 30. The sequence length is ℓ = 580 076, we use an order m Markov model and a sample of size M = 1 000. (*) for 123 terms in the sample we got P (N) = 0 and hence, SN was not computed.