> top > docs > PMC:7455510


Clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunosuppressed children in Spain

Limited information is available regarding SARS-CoV-2 infections in children with underlying diseases. A retrospective study of children less than 15 years old with primary or secondary immunosuppression infected with SARS-CoV-2 during March 2020 was performed. In this series, 8 immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 disease are reported, accounting for 15% of the positive cases detected in children in a reference hospital. The severity of the symptoms was mild-moderate in the majority with a predominance of febrile syndrome, with mild radiological involvement and in some cases with mild respiratory distress that required oxygen therapy. The rational and prudent management of these patients is discussed, evaluating possible treatments and options for hospitalization or outpatient follow-up.
Conclusion: In our experience, monitoring of children with immunosuppression and COVID-19 disease can be performed as outpatients if close monitoring is possible. Hospitalization should be assessed when high fever, radiological involvement, and/or respiratory distress are present.
What is Known:
• SARS-CoV-2 infection is usually mild in children.
What is New:
• Outcome of immunosuppressed children with COVID-19 is generally good, with a mild-moderate course.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in children younger than 10 years of age has been described in around 1% of identified cases in China [1]. Although data on children is still limited, most series agree that cases are mostly mild, even in infants [2, 3]. Very little information is available about pediatric patients with underlying diseases, and data in children with immunosuppression is almost non-existent. COVID-19 serious disease has been described in a child with post-chemotherapy agranulocytosis due to acute leukemia [4]. Preliminary data from Bergamo [5] indicates that in Italy, practically no cases of infection have been detected in immunosuppressed patients (3 mild cases), which has led them to consider that this group of patients is not a high-risk group for COVID-19 disease.
Spain is currently one of the most affected countries with more than 100,000 reported cases. The first case in Spain was declared on January 31st, 2020, and the first case in Madrid was declared on February 27th, 2020. La Paz University Hospital in Madrid, Spain, is a national reference tertiary center for transplanted, oncological, and immunosuppressed children. Over 1,300 pediatric solid organ (SOT) and 630 hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) have been performed in our hospital, and more than 3,200 cancer patients have been treated over more than five decades. Per year, we diagnose 100–120 new pediatric cancer patients, and perform 35 HSCT and 65 SOT. Our aim was to describe the children with primary or secondary immunosuppression, and SARS-CoV-2 infection attended in our hospital during the month of March.

Patients and methods
A retrospective study (1st to 31st of March, 2020) of children less than 15 years old with primary or secondary immunosuppression infected with SARS-CoV-2 and treated at the University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain, was performed. For inclusion in the study, the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had to be positive. PCR was performed via nasal swabs, and if the test was initially negative but clinical suspicion was high, it was repeated in the next 24 h. Inpatients and outpatients were included.
Symptoms, blood analysis results and radiological data, previous underlying disease, immunosuppressive treatment, treatment received for COVID-19 disease, and evolution were collected.

During the month of March, a total of 315 children were tested in our hospital for SARS-CoV-2 and 51 were positive (16%). Twenty-eight of the positive cases (55%) were admitted. A total of 8 positive cases (15%) were immunosuppressed patients, and 3 were followed as outpatients. The underlying pathology was hemato-oncological in most cases (three patients had undergone a hematopoietic stem cell transplant), two patients had undergone a liver or a kidney transplant, and the last case was a girl on chronic hemodialysis with a vasculitis receiving immunosuppressive treatment. The median age was 12.6 years (interquartile range: IQR 9.5–12.6). All the patients had been on immunosuppressive treatment with a median duration of 24 months (IQR 12–93). All had respiratory symptoms, 5 of them had fever, and the majority had slight radiological alterations (only two had focal infiltrates). In only one case the chest X-ray worsened during hospitalization. One patient needed oxygen therapy and one case had diarrhea. None of them had anosmia or ageusia. One patient developed a hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (sHLH), with persistent fever, cytopenias, low fibrinogen and elevated triglycerides, and elevated ferritin, and required specific treatment with dexamethasone, as per the HLH-2004 protocol. Antiviral treatment was initiated according to our National guidelines, developed by the National Infectious Disease Society (SEIP), in coordination with the National Pediatric Intensive Care Society (SECIP) and the National Pediatric Association (AEP) available at https://www.aeped.es/noticias/documento-manejo-clinico-paciente-pediatrico-y-pacientes-riesgo-con-infeccion-por-sars-cov2. Hydroxychloroquine was initiated upon diagnosis (positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2) when there were signs/ symptoms of moderate-severe disease (respiratory signs, pneumonia on chest X ray, blood parameters of severity such as lymphopenia or elevated CRP, D-dimer or Il-6). Remdesivir was requested, under compassionate use, in the most severe cases. Following theses guidelines, in 5/8 cases, some antiviral treatment was prescribed, with hydroxychloroquine being the most frequent. Two patients received remdesivir (the two oncological patients who required admission: patient 1 who had oxygen requirement and patient 4 who had persistent symptoms with severe lymphopenia and elevated inflammatory parameters) and only one patient received tocilizumab due to persistent fever and elevated IL-6. There were no significant toxicities following the treatments received. Immunosuppressive therapy was decreased or withdrawn in 6 patients (the other two had been off immunosuppression for 1 and 2 months, respectively). All but one case developed progressive lymphopenia. D-dimer was moderately elevated. With a median follow up of 106 days (IQR 103–113) from COVID-19 diagnosis, no child required admission to the pediatric intensive care unit or died. At present, all the patients are being followed up as outpatients and have had no further complications related to COVID-19. The clinical characteristics of the patients, as well as details on the treatment received, are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of immunocompromised children with COVID-19 disease
Case # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Age (years) 15 13 12.6 9 6.7 11 12.6 14.8
Gender F M M M M M F M
Primary disease HSCT
PID (CTLA4 deficiency) HSCT
Myelodysplastic syndrome HSCT
B-ALL T-ALL Melanoma Liver Tx C-ANCA vasculitis.
Hemodialysis Kidney Tx
Immunosuppressive treatment/targeted therapy None (stopped for 1 month). CD4 cells: 216/ μL Ruxolitinib None (stopped for 2 months). CD4 cells: 30/ μL Oral mercaptopurine and methotrexate Trametinib Prednisone, tacrolimus Prednisone, azathioprine Prednisone, tacrolimus, mycophenolate (MMF)
Fever Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
Cough No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sore throat No Yes No No No No Yes No
Dyspnea Yes No No No No No No No
(minimum value) 730 1210 520 340 2730 970 380 1620
D-dimer ng/mL
(maximum value) 301 - 418 1143 370 - 1168 -
IL-6 pg/mL (maximum value) 9.60 2.30 - 192 - - - -
C- Reactive Protein (mg/L) 26.2 1.9 18.9 24.6 0.6 0.9 9 106
Ferritin (mg/dl) Not done Not done 622 1534 Not done Not done 1270 553
Chest X-ray Normal
lobectomy) Interstitial infiltrate Interstitial infiltrate Interstitial infiltrate Focal infiltrate Mild parahilar infiltrates Normal initially but focal infiltrate on evolution Focal infiltrate
Required hospitalization Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Treatment HCQ*
Remdesivir** IS withdrawal HCQ* IS withdrawal
Dexamethasone*** Trametinib withdrawal Reduction in IS (50% tacrolimus reduction) Reduction in IS (azathioprine withdrawal)
HCQ* Reduction in IS (MMF withdrawal, tacrolimus decrease and prednisone increase)
Duration of stay (days) 11 - - 28 - 3 4 2
Complications O2 requirement on nasal cannula (maximun 2 lpm) None None HLH-like syndrome None None None None
F female, M male, HSCT: hematopoietic stem cell transplant, PID primary immunodeficiency, B-ALL: B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, T-ALL T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Tx transplant, HCQ hydroxychloroquine, IS immunosuppressors, LPV/Rtv lopinavir/ritonavir, O2 oxygen; HLH hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. MMF mycophenolate
*HCQ was initiated in patients 1, 3, 4, and 8 once confirmation of positive SARS-CoV-2 with a nasal swab was obtained (< 24 h from consultation at our hospital). Patients 1, 3, and 8 attended the Emergency Department in the first 24 h after onset of symptoms. Patient 4 had fever of 4 days when the nasal swab was obtained, and patient 7 received 5 days of LPV/Rtv initially and due to persistent symptoms was switched to HCQ. According to our guidelines, the oral dose was as follows: HCQ 6.5 mg/kg/day (dosing q12 h) in 6 year-olds, and HCQ 10 mg/kg/day (dosing q12 h) in children > 6 years (maximum daily dose 400 mg) for 5 days
**Remdesivir was given for a total of 7 days on patient 1 and 10 days on patient 4, at an intravenous dose of 5 mg/kg on day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 2.5 mg/kg from days 2 to 9 (patients <40 kg) or 200 mg/iv on day 1 followed by 100 mg/iv on days 2-9 (for patients >40 kg)
***Dexamethasone was given as per the HLH 2004 trial, although with a shorter duration: 10 mg/m2/day for 7 days, followed by 5 mg/m2/day for another 7 days, followed by 2.5 mg/m2 for 7 days and 1.25 mg/m2 for 2 days and then a tapering dose with hydrocortisone

In this small series, 8 immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 disease are reported, accounting for 15% of the positive cases detected in children in a reference hospital. The severity of the symptoms was mild-moderate in the majority with a predominance of febrile syndrome, with mild radiological involvement and in some cases with mild respiratory distress that required oxygen therapy. Most patients received antiviral treatment, and immunosuppressive treatment was decreased or even discontinued for a short period of time in most of them.
It has been described by most of the authors that children have a milder disease than adults [2, 3] and immunocompromised patients do not seem to evolve differently [5]. Data in children is practically non-existent. Recently, a study carried out by the European Society for Gastroenterology (ESPGHAN), described children with inflammatory bowel disease who presented COVID-19 disease with a mild outpatient course [6]. In addition, they warned of the risk of developing acute exacerbations of the disease if immunosuppressant treatments were delayed. Data from cancer pediatric patients is scarce. A recent report from a childhood cancer center in Lombardy, Italy, reported five positive cases in childhood cancer patients and all of them had a mild course [7]. In fact, the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) highlighted that there is no reason to discontinue daily activities in pediatric hematology/oncology units; however, general principles for prevention were recommended [8].
SARS-CoV-2 infection is proposed to evolve in three phases, causing mortality in the third phase, after 2 or more weeks from symptom onset [9]. During the early phase, SARS-CoV-2 multiplies and establishes residence in the host, primarily focusing on the respiratory system. SARS-CoV-2 binds to its target using the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), receptor on human cells [10] mainly in human lung, small intestine epithelium, as well as the vascular endothelium. This phase presents with mild respiratory symptoms. During the second phase, lung involvement is established, with viral pneumonia and the development of hypoxia. Lymphopenia appears or increases and a moderate increase in inflammatory markers can be observed. A minority of patients will reach the third phase of systemic hyperinflammation. There is a decrease in helper, suppressor, and regulatory T cell counts, with increase of inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers such as interleukins IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, macrophage inflammatory protein 1-α, tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein, ferritin, and D-dimer [11]. A hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (sHLH) may occur in patients in this advanced stage of disease.
The possibility that immunosuppressed patients may not be able to progress to advanced stages of the disease could explain why most behave with mild symptoms, as previously reported [5]. Although our patients presented lymphopenia, most of them did not have significantly increased D-dimer or Il-6 when it was performed. Despite two patients having elevated D-dimer, anticoagulation treatment was not given, as it is not recommended by our Spanish Infectious Disease Society based on the available evidence. One of our patients developed sHLH that was treated with dexamethasone as per the HLH-2004 trial and entered remission. The patient finished the course of steroids, and had no signs of recurrence. Therefore, although most children have a mild-moderate course, it is important to be aware of possible complications that require prompt intervention.
A problem that must be assessed is the balance between risk and benefit of the suspension of the immunosuppressive treatment. We believe that risk has to be individually assessed, as well as the necessity to start specific antiviral treatments.
Based on our experience, monitoring of children with immunosuppression and COVID-19 disease can be performed as outpatients, if close monitoring is possible with radiological and blood test controls if necessary, and carefully selecting the patients depending on their individual risk. Hospitalization should be assessed when high fever, radiological involvement, and/or respiratory distress is present. Also, it should be considered if there are signs of disease severity (lymphopenia, elevated D-dimer, C-reactive protein or Interleukin-6). Depending on the evolution, an sHLH must be ruled out. A judicious and conservative treatment seems safe and recommended since to date no antiviral treatment has shown efficacy. It is particularly relevant to be very careful when recommending any specific antiviral treatment in this group of patients given the numerous drug interactions that may appear with their immunosuppressive treatment, such as calcineurin inhibitors, among others. The available tables of pharmacological interactions should always be consulted.
Other groups should communicate their experience with these patients to offer appropriate treatment and follow-up.

Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author Contribution
Dr. P-M and Dr. M conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. F, Dr. F-C, Dr. R, Dr. G collected data, collaborated in drafted the initial manuscript and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. C designed the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, collaborated in drafted the initial manuscript and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Document structure show

projects that include this document

Unselected / annnotation Selected / annnotation